Emerging modes of digitalisation in the delivery of welfare-to-work: Implications for street-level discretion

被引:18
作者
Ball, Sarah [1 ]
McGann, Michael [1 ]
Nguyen, Phuc [2 ]
Considine, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
artificial intelligence; automation; digitalisation; street-level bureaucracy; welfare-to-work; PROVISION; COERCION;
D O I
10.1111/spol.12939
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Countries are increasingly looking to 'digitalise' how public services are delivered, with welfare-to-work and public employment services being key sites of reform. It is hoped that digitalisation can achieve efficient, effective, and targeted services for those in need and there is now a growing body of research on both the opportunities and pitfalls associated with this transition to digital welfare states. However, as a concept, 'digitalisation' remains ambiguously defined, hindering understanding of the distinct ways that discrete technological innovations are reshaping citizens' access to social protection and the role of street-level discretion in welfare administration. Drawing on interviews with expert informants from three countries pioneering digital reforms, this study aims to better understand what digitalisation entails for the delivery of activation. We identify three discrete modes of 'digitalisation' in welfare-to-work programmes: virtual engagement (remote activation), transactional automation (self-activation), and digital triaging (targeted activation). Far from digitalisation heralding the automation and curtailment of frontline discretion, the different modes reshape frontline delivery and citizens' access to social protection in specific ways.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1180
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Agency for Digital Government, 2022, NEW JOINT GOV DIG ST
[2]  
Alston P., 2019, DIGITAL WELFARE STAT
[3]   The technocratic rationality of governance-the case of the Danish employment services [J].
Andersen, Niklas Andreas .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 15 (04) :425-443
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, BUYING SELLING POOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2023, MARKETISATION WELFAR
[6]  
Australian Government, 2018, NEXT GEN EMPL SERV D
[7]  
Blaikie N., 2009, DESIGNING SOCIAL RES
[8]   From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control [J].
Bovens, M ;
Zouridis, S .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (02) :174-184
[9]   Digital coping: How frontline workers cope with digital service encounters [J].
Breit, Eric ;
Egeland, Cathrine ;
Loberg, Ida B. ;
Rohnebaek, Maria T. .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 55 (05) :833-847
[10]  
Brodkin E.Z., 2013, WORK WELFARE STATE S, P17