Misalignment Between Citizen Science Project Leaders and Their Organizations Increases the Challenges They Face Achieving Project Outcomes

被引:1
作者
Hunter, Danielle E. Lin [5 ]
Knebel, Callan A. [3 ]
Newman, Gregory J. [1 ,4 ]
Balgopal, Meena M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol, Ft Collins, CO USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Chem, Ft Collins, CO USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO USA
[5] 3434 Edwards Mill Rd,Ste 112-378, Raleigh, NC 27612 USA
关键词
citizen science; funding; goals; organizational culture; project management; project outcomes; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ROLE-CONFLICT; ROLE AMBIGUITY; JOB; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/08941920.2024.2329914
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Citizen science values include increasing natural resource management, enabling large-scale research, promoting education and scientific literacy, addressing environmental injustice, mitigating climate change, and more. Project leaders often work toward multiple outcomes at once and must prioritize their focus. Prioritization is complicated given the competing interests of scientists, volunteers, funders, and others. According to role conflict theory, this negatively affects the ability of project leaders to carry out their jobs. We conducted a phenomenological study with project leaders (n = 65) to understand perceptions as they relate to diverse goals and interests. Project leaders who described misalignment between their own goals and what they perceived to be their organization's goals more frequently reported challenges related to balancing scientists' and volunteers' interests, convincing colleagues to trust data, and being part-time employees. Given these results, we describe important implications for how organizations engaging in citizen science can address these challenges and better achieve goals.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1034
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Adiguzel Z., 2019, INT J ECON MANAG, V1, P37
[2]   Global air quality and pollution [J].
Akimoto, H .
SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5651) :1716-1719
[3]   Organizationally based citizen science: considerations for implementation [J].
Anderson, Ashley A. ;
Williams, Elizabeth A. ;
Long, Marilee ;
Carter, Ellison ;
Volckens, John .
JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2020, 19 (03)
[4]   Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science [J].
Anhalt-Depies, Christine ;
Stenglein, Jennifer L. ;
Zuckerberg, Benjamin ;
Townsend, Philip A. ;
Rissman, Adena R. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 238
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data
[6]  
Ballard HL, 2018, CITIZEN SCIENCE, P254
[7]   RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ROLE-THEORY [J].
BIDDLE, BJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1986, 12 :67-92
[8]  
Bowen G.A., 2019, Sage research methods foundations, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781526421036
[9]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[10]   Success factors for citizen science projects in water quality monitoring [J].
Capdevila, Anna San Llorente ;
Kokimova, Ainur ;
Ray, Saunak Sinha ;
Avellan, Tamara ;
Kim, Jiwon ;
Kirschke, Sabrina .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 728