Public sector's efficiency as a reflection of governance quality, an European Union study

被引:6
作者
Negri, Camelia [1 ]
Dinca, Gheorghita [1 ]
机构
[1] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Finance & Accounting, Brasov, Romania
关键词
EU MEMBER STATES; GOVERNMENT; IMPACT; DETERMINANTS; CORRUPTION; DEMOCRACY; ENHANCE; DEA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0291048
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The main objective of this paper is to assess the efficiency of the European Union's public sector from a quality of governance approach, employing a two-step methodology. In the first stage, EU states' efficiency scores are determined using Data Envelopment Analysis. Once quantifying public efficiency, the second step of the methodology examines the determinants of efficiency using a quantile regression estimation technique, with an emphasis on demographic features, corruption, economic freedom, and governmental digitalization. The novelty is provided by the assessment of the public sector's efficiency and efficacy from a broader approach in order to determine the efficiency scores of European Union countries, as well as the key factors that may impact the public sector's performance. The main findings, namely that governance quality can be considered an important resource in analysing public performance and that human resources, freedom, democracy, corruption, and digitalization have an impact on efficiency, are important considerations not only for policymakers but also for society, researchers, and the academic community. Reform measures should strive to improve both the technical and democratic components of public institutions in order to more effectively and transparently allocate public resources, while taking into consideration local and national peculiarities.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Does Good Governance Matter? Kazakhstan's Economic Growth and Worldwide Governance Indicators [J].
Absadykov, Aikozha .
OTORITAS-JURNAL ILMU PEMERINTAHAN, 2020, 10 (01) :1-13
[2]  
ADDINK H., 2019, Good Governance: Concept and Context, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198841159.001.0001]
[3]   Public sector efficiency: An international comparison [J].
Afonso, A ;
Schuknecht, L ;
Tanzi, V .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2005, 123 (3-4) :321-347
[4]  
Afonso A., 2013, Inter-American Development Bank, 80478, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2365007
[5]   Structural Tax Reforms and Public Spending Efficiency [J].
Afonso, Antonio ;
Jalles, Joao Tovar ;
Venancio, Ana .
OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW, 2021, 32 (05) :1017-1061
[6]   Public sector efficiency: evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets [J].
Afonso, Antonio ;
Schuknecht, Ludger ;
Tanzi, Vito .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (17) :2147-2164
[7]   Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Public Hospitals: The Case of Saudi Arabia [J].
Alatawi, Ahmed D. ;
Niessen, Louis W. ;
Khan, Jahangir A. M. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2020, 10 (01)
[8]   The impact of government outsourcing on public spending: Evidence from European Union countries [J].
Alonso, Jose M. ;
Clifton, Judith ;
Diaz-Fuentes, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2017, 39 (02) :333-348
[9]   The Nexus Between Worldwide Governance Indicators and Hydropower Sustainable Growth in EU 28 Region [J].
Alsaleh, Mohd ;
Abdul-Rahim, A. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (06) :1001-1015
[10]   The importance of worldwide governance indicators for transitions toward sustainable bioenergy industry [J].
Alsaleh, Mohd ;
Abdul-Rahim, A. S. ;
Abdulwakil, Mansur Muhammad .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 294