A Comparative Analysis of Pain Control Methods after Ankle Fracture Surgery with a Peripheral Nerve Block: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Prospective Study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jeong-Kil [1 ]
Lee, Gi-Soo [1 ]
Kim, Sang-Bum [1 ]
Kang, Chan [1 ]
Kim, Kyong-Sik [2 ]
Song, Jae-Hwang [3 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Daejeon 34134, South Korea
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Anaesthesia, Sejong Hosp, Sejong 30099, South Korea
[3] Konyang Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Coll Med, Daejeon 35365, South Korea
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 07期
关键词
ankle fracture; anesthetic; nerve block; pain management; postoperative pain control; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ROPIVACAINE; EPINEPHRINE; DEXAMETHASONE; ANALGESIA; DURATION; PHARMACOKINETICS; BUPIVACAINE; PROLONGS;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59071302
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Patients experience severe pain after surgical correction of ankle fractures. Although their exact mechanism is unknown, dexamethasone and epinephrine increase the analgesic effect of anesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks. This study aimed to compare the postoperative pain control efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone/epinephrine and peripheral nerve blocks with only ropivacaine and added patient-controlled analgesia in patients with ankle fractures. Materials and Methods: This randomized, controlled prospective study included patients aged 18-70 years surgically treated for ankle fractures between December 2021 and September 2022. The patients were divided into group A (n = 30), wherein pain was controlled using patient-controlled analgesia after lower extremity peripheral nerve block, and group B (n = 30), wherein dexamethasone/epinephrine was combined with the anesthetic solution during peripheral nerve block. In both groups, ropivacaine was used as the anesthetic solution for peripheral nerve block, and this peripheral nerve block was performed just before ankle surgery for the purpose of anesthesia for surgery. Pain (visual analog scale), patient satisfaction, and side effects were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: The patients' demographic data were similar between groups. Pain scores were significantly lower in group B than in group A postoperatively. Satisfaction scores were significantly higher in group B (p = 0.003). There were no anesthesia-related complications in either group. Conclusions: Dexamethasone and epinephrine as adjuvant anesthetic solutions can effectively control pain when performing surgery using peripheral nerve blocks for patients with ankle fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ropivacaine plus lidocaine versus bupivacaine plus lidocaine for peribulbar block in cataract surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, comparative clinical study
    Moolagani, Venkata Ramanareddy
    Burla, Shanker Rao
    Neethipudi, Bhaskara Rao
    Upadhyayula, Suryanarayana Murthy
    Bikkina, Anusha
    Arepalli, Narasimha Rao
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 498 - 503
  • [32] Was femoral nerve block effective for pain control of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy? A single blinded randomized controlled study
    Ren, Yi-Ming
    Tian, Meng-Qiang
    Duan, Yuan-Hui
    Sun, Yun-Bo
    Yang, Tao
    Hou, Wei-Yu
    Xie, Shu-Hua
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E23978
  • [33] Effects of a Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Video-Assisted Lung Wedge Resection: A Single-Center, Prospective, and Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, Seokjin
    Sung, Tae-Yun
    Cho, Choon-Kyu
    Lee, Gyuwon
    Kwon, Woojin
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (01):
  • [34] Superior hypogastric nerve plexus (SHNP) block for pain management after minimally invasive gynecology surgeries: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Agrawal, Neha
    Singh, Pratibha
    Goyal, Manu
    Yadav, Garima
    Shekhar, Shashank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2025, 168 (02) : 605 - 612
  • [35] Pudendal Nerve Block for Posthemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Prospective, Single-Blinded Randomized Control Trial
    Steen, Christopher J.
    Lam, David
    Chandra, Raaj
    Chua, Jonathan Y. J.
    An, Vinna
    Keck, James O.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (04) : 546 - 551
  • [36] Analgesic effectiveness of continuous versus single-injection adductor canal block in addition to continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fracture surgery: Prospective randomized controlled trial
    Park, Young Uk
    Joe, Han Bum
    Lee, Jong Wha
    Seo, Young Wook
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2025, 30 (01) : 159 - 163
  • [37] Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for early analgesia in elderly patients with hip fractures: a single-center prospective randomized controlled study
    Tang, Yan
    Zhang, Xinlei
    Yi, Shuai
    Li, Dan
    Guo, Hui
    Liu, Yunqing
    Liu, Jindong
    Kong, Mingjian
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [38] Development and internal validation of a multivariable risk prediction model for severe rebound pain after foot and ankle surgery involving single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block
    Jen, Tim T. H.
    Ke, Janny X. C.
    Wing, Kevin J.
    Denomme, Justine
    McIsaac, Daniel I.
    Huang, Shih-Chieh
    Ree, Ronald M.
    Prabhakar, Christopher
    Schwarz, Stephan K. W.
    Yarnold, Cynthia H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 129 (01) : 127 - 135
  • [39] Adjunctive dexamethasone palmitate use for intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective, randomized control trial
    Hui, Hongliang
    Miao, Haoran
    Qiu, Fan
    Lin, Yangui
    Li, Huaming
    Zhang, Yiqian
    Jiang, Bo
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [40] Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Block Versus Single-Shot Nerve Block for Distal Radius Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial
    Ganta, Abhishek
    Ding, David
    Fisher, Nina
    Lavery, Jessica
    Jain, Sudheer
    Tejwani, Nirmal C.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2018, 32 (01) : 22 - 26