The impacts of conventional energies on environmental degradation: does Pakistan's economic and environmental model follow the Kuznets curve?

被引:6
作者
Nizamani, Rafeeque A. [1 ]
Shaikh, Faheemullah [2 ]
Nizamani, Abdul Ghafoor [3 ]
Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain [2 ]
Kumar, Laveet [1 ]
Assad, Mamdouh El Haj [4 ]
机构
[1] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan
[2] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan
[3] Southeast Univ, Dept Architecture, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 21009, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sharjah, Sustainable & Renewable Energy Engn Dept, POB 27272, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Conventional energies; Environmental Kuznets curve; Pakistan; Urbanization; Manufacturing; Trade openness; CO2; EMISSIONS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CARBON EMISSIONS; EKC HYPOTHESIS; CONSUMPTION; GROWTH; PANEL; TRADE; INCOME;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-22611-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the long-run dynamic association of carbon dioxide emissions and economic progress using the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis for Pakistan from 1972 to 2019. The other variables used along with the above indicators are urbanization, financial development, manufacturing, oil and gas energy consumption, and trade openness. The ARDL bounds testing methodology has been used and the results of the bound testing showed that a 1% increase in economic growth and financial development would increase CO2 emissions in the country by 4.277 and 0.0787%, respectively. Urbanization and manufacturing would increase CO2 emissions by 0.648 and 0.171%, respectively. Oil and gas energy consumption would also increase CO2 emissions by 0.130 and 0.1935%, respectively. Trade openness is the only factor found in the study which decreases emissions in the country in the long run by -0.087%. Besides, findings confirm the EKC hypothesis with the reversed U-shaped relation for per capita CO2 emissions and economic progress. However, the threshold point of the economy is approximately $2735.19 per capita, where economic progress can mitigate the impact of pollution lies beyond the study period, and GDP growth still increases emissions of the country and degrades the environment of Pakistan, as it is not yet reached at the turning level of the economy. As a result, GDP growth is still harming the economy of Pakistan as it has not yet reached the turning point of the economy.
引用
收藏
页码:7173 / 7185
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: Is there any environmental Kuznets curve? [J].
Ahmad, Najid ;
Du, Liangsheng ;
Lu, Jiye ;
Wang, Jianlin ;
Li, Hong-Zhou ;
Hashmi, Muhammad Zaffar .
ENERGY, 2017, 123 :164-172
[2]   Revisiting the role of financial development for energy-growth-trade nexus in BRICS economies [J].
Ahmed, Khalid .
ENERGY, 2017, 128 :487-495
[3]   The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? [J].
Akbostanci, Elif ;
Turut-Asik, Serap ;
Tunc, G. Ipek .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) :861-867
[4]   The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: The role of energy prices [J].
Al-Mulali, Usama ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :1622-1631
[5]   The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach [J].
Allard, Alexandra ;
Takman, Johanna ;
Uddin, Gazi Salah ;
Ahmed, Ali .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (06) :5848-5861
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Climate Change Operational Framework 2017-2030. Enhanced Actions for Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate-Resilient Development, DOI [10.22617/TCS178947-2, DOI 10.22617/TCS178947-2]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, WORLD DEV INDICATORS
[8]   Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: An ethical dilemma [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Filis, George .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 68 :808-824
[9]   Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States [J].
Baek, Jungho .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 :352-356
[10]   The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach [J].
Bilgili, Faik ;
Kocak, Emrah ;
Bulut, Umit .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :838-845