Synergy/trade-offs and differential optimization of production, living, and ecological functions in the Yangtze River economic Belt, China

被引:53
|
作者
Zhao, Jia [1 ]
Zhao, Yuluan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Incubat Base Karst Mt Ecol Environm, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
关键词
Production; living; ecological functions; Synergies; trade-offs; GWR model; Differential regulation strategy; Yangtze River Economic Belt; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109925
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) is a major strategy related to China's overall national development. Based on the synergy/trade-offs of production, living, and ecological functions (PLEFs) in the YREB from 2000 to 2020, this paper puts forward suggestions for the optimization of territorial space to promote the high-quality development of the YREB. The mechanistic equilibrium model was applied to determine the synergy/trade-off relationship of PLEFs, and the key factors affecting the coordination degree were analyzed with the help of a geographical detector and a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to further identify the trade-off zones and propose differential optimization strategies. The results showed that the average degree of synergy of PLEFs decreased from 0.18 to 0.08 in YREB during the study period, and the co-ordination developed to a higher level, forming a local patchwork of coordination "highlands" in space, with a gradient divergence of coordination from west to east. The land-use degree, landscape, slope, traffic, and nightlight index were the dominant factors influencing PLEFs, and their q-values were 0.30, 0.27, 0.20, 0.18 and 0.14 in order, with significant spatial differences in the effects of each factor's role. Based on the deviation of the coordination degree of PLEFs, three major function-dominated zones were divided, and it was found that the YREB showed an evolutionary trend of ecological function domination (2000) to production function domination (2010) to ecological function domination (2020). The trade-off zones in antagonistic and dysregulated states were further identified, and the study proposed targeted optimization strategies. The findings provide theoretical reference to promote the sustainable use of territorial resources and high-quality regional development in the YREB and the rest of the country.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What impact does the new urbanization in China's Yangtze River economic belt have on the ecological environment?
    Ke, Xiaoling
    Min, Yuanyuan
    Guo, Haixiang
    Wang, Deyun
    Mougharbel, Amal
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 26 (10) : 26679 - 26698
  • [32] Trade-offs between midstream agricultural production and downstream ecological sustainability in the Heihe River basin in the past half century
    Lu, Zhixiang
    Wei, Yongping
    Xiao, Honglang
    Zou, Songbing
    Ren, Juan
    Lyle, Clive
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 152 : 233 - 242
  • [33] Research on the Game Mechanism of Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standards Determination: Based on the Empirical Analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Liu, Mengba
    Zhang, Anlu
    Zhang, Xiong
    Xiong, Yanfei
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [34] Integrating ecosystem service trade-offs and rocky desertification into ecological security pattern construction in the Daning river basin of southwest China
    Gou, Mengmeng
    Li, Le
    Ouyang, Shuai
    Shu, Chang
    Xiao, Wenfa
    Wang, Na
    Hu, Jianwen
    Liu, Changfu
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 138
  • [35] Detection and attribution of changes in cultivated land use ecological efficiency: A case study on Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Yin, Yuqing
    Hou, Xianhui
    Liu, Jingming
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Daojun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
  • [36] Simulation and prediction of multi-scenario evolution of ecological space based on FLUS model: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Liu, Xiaoqiong
    Wang, Xu
    Chen, Kunlun
    Li, Dan
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 33 (02) : 373 - 391
  • [37] Geospatial characteristics and the application of land use functions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: Perspectives on provinces and urban agglomerations
    Gao, Yunxiao
    Wang, Zhanqi
    Xu, Feng
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 155
  • [38] Integrating ecosystem service value in the disclosure of landscape ecological risk changes: a case study in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Fu, Jianhui
    Song, Min
    Xie, Wenyan
    Peng, Jingyi
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2024, 30 (3-4): : 326 - 351
  • [39] The impact of ecological environment pressure on renewable energy technology innovation: evidence from China's Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Yin, Shanggang
    Zhou, Junjie
    Zhou, Yijing
    Xiao, Weiwei
    Bai, Caiquan
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [40] Spatial identification and multilevel zoning of land use functions improve sustainable regional management: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Gao, Yunxiao
    Wang, Zhanqi
    Zhang, Liguo
    Chai, Ji
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (10) : 27782 - 27798