A review of supply chain transparency research: Antecedents, technologies, types, and outcomes

被引:10
作者
Budler, Marko [1 ]
Quiroga, Bernardo F. [2 ,3 ]
Trkman, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Sch Econ & Business, Acad Unit Business Informat & Logist, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] West Virginia Univ, John Chambers Coll Business & Econ, Morgantown, WV USA
[3] West Virginia Univ, John Chambers Coll Business & Econ, POB 6025, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
information sharing; supply chain; technology enablers; transparency; visibility; INFORMATION TRANSPARENCY; CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; COST TRANSPARENCY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; BUSINESS; TRUST; IMPACT; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1111/jbl.12368
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The growing popularity of "Supply Chain Transparency" (SCT) as an idea has motivated its use as a "buzzword," leading to a lack of terminological clarity. Terms like visibility, transparency, and traceability are used colloquially or as synonyms for one another, yet often without a proper conceptual basis. We argue that the absence of a clear understanding of SCT limits the ability of scholars and practitioners to fully understand the role played by transparency in supply chains and to study its antecedents, technologies, types, and outcomes. Therefore, transparency research is at the point where a scoping review of literature on SCT is particularly useful. Our review first provides a formal conceptualization of SCT, allowing us to identify how transparency has been understood, the building blocks of SCT, and what distinguishes SCT from other concepts. In the review, we initially identify relevant concepts underlying SCT with a view to establish a unifying and nuanced framework for SCT. Second, using that unified conceptualization as a basis, primary outcomes such as the benefits and risks of SCT are determined. Third, we systematically detect and classify future research opportunities arising from the building blocks of SCT.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 214 条
  • [1] Effect of Information Feedback on the Outcomes and Dynamics of Multisourcing Multiattribute Procurement Auctions
    Adomavicius, Gediminas
    Gupta, Alok
    Sanyal, Pallab
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 28 (04) : 199 - 229
  • [2] Akkermans H, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V153, P445, DOI [10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00164-4, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00164-43]
  • [3] The impact of ERP on supply chain management:: Exploratory findings from a European Delphi study
    Akkermans, HA
    Bogerd, P
    Yücesan, E
    van Wassenhove, LN
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 146 (02) : 284 - 301
  • [4] Do You See What I See? A Simulation Analysis of Order Bundling within a Transparent User Network in Geographic Space
    Ambra, Tomas
    Caris, An
    Macharis, Cathy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2021, 42 (01) : 167 - 190
  • [5] Anderson R. D., 2016, PROMOTING COMPETITIO
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, The Economics of Collusion: Cartels and Bidding Rings
  • [7] Transparency in food supply chains: A review of enabling technology solutions
    Astill, Jake
    Dara, Rozita A.
    Campbell, Malcolm
    Farber, Jeffrey M.
    Fraser, Evan D. G.
    Sharif, Shayan
    Yada, Rickey Y.
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 91 (240-247) : 240 - 247
  • [8] Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives
    Aung, Myo Min
    Chang, Yoon Seok
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2014, 39 : 172 - 184
  • [9] Agent-level determinants of price expectation formation in online double-sided auctions
    Avci, Ezgi
    Bunn, Derek
    Ketter, Wolfgang
    van Heck, Eric
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2019, 124
  • [10] The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices
    Awaysheh, Amrou
    Klassen, Robert D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (12) : 1246 - 1268