Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer

被引:6
作者
Nieminen, Teija [1 ,2 ,4 ,7 ]
Tapiovaara, Laura [3 ]
Back, Leif [3 ,4 ]
Lindford, Andrew [4 ,5 ]
Lassus, Patrik [4 ,5 ]
Lehtonen, Lasse [4 ,6 ]
Makitie, Antti [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Keski-Santti, Harri [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, HUS, Dept Perioperat & Intens Care Med, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Dept Plast Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, HUS Diagnost Ctr, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Res Program Syst Oncol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
ERAS; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Head and neck cancer; Free flap surgery; Microvascular reconstruction; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MAJOR HEAD; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; RECONSTRUCTION; PROPHYLAXIS; OPERATIONS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-023-08292-3
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines have been developed to optimize pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of surgical oncology patients. The aim of this study was to compare management outcome of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction at our institution before and after the implementation of the ERAS guidelines.Methods This retrospective study comprised 283 patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction between 2013 and 2020. Patients operated before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol in October 2017 formed the pre-ERAS group (n = 169), and ERAS group (n = 114), respectively.Results In the pre-ERAS group the mean length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit length of the stay (ICU-LOS) were 20 days (range 7-79) and 6 days (range 1-32), and in the ERAS group 13 days (range 3-70) and 5 days (range 1-24), respectively. Both LOS (p < 0.001) and ICU-LOS (p = 0.042) were significantly reduced in the ERAS group compared to the pre-ERAS group. There were significantly fewer medical complications in the ERAS group (p < 0.003). No difference was found between the study groups in the surgical complication rate or in the 30-day or 6-month mortality rate after surgery.Conclusions We found reduced LOS, ICU-LOS, and medical complication rate, but no effect on the surgical complication rate after implementation of the ERAS guidelines, which supports their use in major HNC surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 914
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Head and Neck Surgery
    Worrall, Douglas M.
    Tanella, Anthony
    DeMaria, Samuel, Jr.
    Miles, Brett A.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 52 (06) : 1095 - +
  • [32] Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for head and neck cancer patients: Considerations and best practices
    Prasad Aman
    Chorath Kevin
    Barrette Louis-Xavier
    Go Beatrice
    Deng Jie
    Moreira Alvaro
    Rajasekaran Karthik
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志英文版, 2022, (02) : 91 - 95
  • [33] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guided gynecologic/oncology surgery - The patient's perspective
    Jenkins, Emma Sian
    Crooks, Rachel
    Sauro, Khara
    Nelson, Gregg
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 55
  • [34] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Requiring Microvascular Reconstruction
    Hanba, Curtis
    Lewis, Carol
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 56 (04) : 801 - 812
  • [35] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Head and Neck Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kattar, Nrusheel
    Wang, Steven X.
    Trojan, Jeffrey D.
    Ballard, Craig R.
    McCoul, Edward D.
    Moore, Brian A.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 168 (04) : 593 - 601
  • [36] Goal-directed fluid management in free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck
    Lahtinen, Sanna L.
    Liisanantti, Janne H.
    Poukkanen, Meri M.
    Laurila, Paivi A.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2017, 83 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [37] Implementation and Outcomes of ERAS Protocol for Major Oncologic Head and Neck Surgery
    Murr, Alexander T.
    Sweeney, Craig
    Lenze, Nicholas R.
    Farquhar, Douglas R.
    Hackman, Trevor G.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (02) : 732 - 740
  • [38] Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol - Compliance improves outcomes: A prospective cohort study
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Kisialeuski, Mikhail
    Wierdak, Mateusz
    Stanek, Maciej
    Natkaniec, Michal
    Matlok, Maciej
    Major, Piotr
    Malczak, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 21 : 75 - 81
  • [39] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in clinical practice
    Leger, Robert
    Livelsberger, Jon
    Sinha, Ashish
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 24 (03) : 335 - 345
  • [40] Enhanced recovery after microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - A prospective study
    Hojvig, Jens H.
    Charabi, Birgitte W.
    Wessel, Irene
    Jensen, Lisa T.
    Nyberg, Jan
    Maymann-Holler, Nana
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Bonde, Christian T.
    JPRAS OPEN, 2022, 34 : 103 - 113