Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer

被引:6
作者
Nieminen, Teija [1 ,2 ,4 ,7 ]
Tapiovaara, Laura [3 ]
Back, Leif [3 ,4 ]
Lindford, Andrew [4 ,5 ]
Lassus, Patrik [4 ,5 ]
Lehtonen, Lasse [4 ,6 ]
Makitie, Antti [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Keski-Santti, Harri [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, HUS, Dept Perioperat & Intens Care Med, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Dept Plast Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, HUS Diagnost Ctr, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Res Program Syst Oncol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
ERAS; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Head and neck cancer; Free flap surgery; Microvascular reconstruction; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MAJOR HEAD; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; RECONSTRUCTION; PROPHYLAXIS; OPERATIONS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-023-08292-3
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines have been developed to optimize pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of surgical oncology patients. The aim of this study was to compare management outcome of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction at our institution before and after the implementation of the ERAS guidelines.Methods This retrospective study comprised 283 patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction between 2013 and 2020. Patients operated before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol in October 2017 formed the pre-ERAS group (n = 169), and ERAS group (n = 114), respectively.Results In the pre-ERAS group the mean length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit length of the stay (ICU-LOS) were 20 days (range 7-79) and 6 days (range 1-32), and in the ERAS group 13 days (range 3-70) and 5 days (range 1-24), respectively. Both LOS (p < 0.001) and ICU-LOS (p = 0.042) were significantly reduced in the ERAS group compared to the pre-ERAS group. There were significantly fewer medical complications in the ERAS group (p < 0.003). No difference was found between the study groups in the surgical complication rate or in the 30-day or 6-month mortality rate after surgery.Conclusions We found reduced LOS, ICU-LOS, and medical complication rate, but no effect on the surgical complication rate after implementation of the ERAS guidelines, which supports their use in major HNC surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 914
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for major head and neck oncologic surgery
    Low, Garren M. I.
    Kiong, Kimberley L.
    Amaku, Ruth
    Kruse, Brittany
    Zheng, Gang
    Weber, Randal S.
    Lewis, Carol M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06)
  • [22] Anaesthesia for reconstructive free flap surgery for head and neck cancer
    McCauley, Peter
    Moore, Michael
    Duggan, Edel
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 83 (05)
  • [23] Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Mavrikis, Judene
    Witowski, Jan
    Adamos, Alexandros
    Major, Piotr
    Nowakowski, Michal
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 35 (06)
  • [24] Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery
    Michał Pędziwiatr
    Judene Mavrikis
    Jan Witowski
    Alexandros Adamos
    Piotr Major
    Michał Nowakowski
    Andrzej Budzyński
    Medical Oncology, 2018, 35
  • [25] Moving to a more restrictive transfusion protocol: Outcomes in head and neck free flap surgery
    Skoog, Hunter
    Chisolm, Paul
    Altonji, Samuel J.
    Moore, Lindsay
    Carroll, William R.
    Richman, Joshua
    Greene, Benjamin
    Grayson, Jessica W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01)
  • [26] Enhanced recovery after surgery, current, and future considerations in head and neck cancer
    List, Marna A.
    Knackstedt, Mark
    Liu, Lucy
    Kasabali, Ahmad
    Mansour, Jobran
    Pang, John
    Asarkar, Ameya A.
    Nathan, Cherie-Ann
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 8 (05): : 1240 - 1256
  • [27] Enhanced recovery after surgery in head and neck surgery: Reduced opioid use and length of stay
    Jandali, Danny B.
    Vaughan, Deborah
    Eggerstedt, Michael
    Ganti, Ashwin
    Scheltens, Holly
    Ramirez, Emily A.
    Revenaugh, Peter C.
    Al-Khudari, Samer
    Smith, Ryan M.
    Stenson, Kerstin M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (05) : 1227 - 1232
  • [28] Background for the introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery and patient outcomes
    Park, Do Joong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 64 (12): : 801 - 805
  • [29] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: A Case-Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Pain Outcomes
    Kiong, Kimberley L.
    Vu, Catherine N.
    Yao, Christopher M. K. L.
    Kruse, Brittany
    Zheng, Gang
    Yu, Peirong
    Weber, Randal S.
    Lewis, Carol M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 867 - 876
  • [30] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Standardisation of care improves patient outcomes
    Pico, Julien
    Sola, Chrystelle
    Saour, Anne Charlotte
    Chapron, Kevin
    Coruble, Lucie
    Bringuier, Sophie
    Dadure, Christophe
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (05)