Stakeholder attitudes and perspectives on wildlife disease surveillance as a component of a One Health approach in Thailand

被引:2
|
作者
George, Serena Elise [1 ,7 ]
Smink, Moniek [2 ]
Sangkachai, Nareerat [3 ,4 ]
Wiratsudakul, Anuwat [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sakcamduang, Walasinee [3 ,5 ]
Suwanpakdee, Sarin [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sleeman, Jonathan M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Vet Med, 2015 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Comp Sci, 1210 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Vet Sci, Thailand Natl Wildlife Hlth Ctr, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Rd, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
[4] Mahidol Univ, Fac Vet Sci, Monitoring & Surveillance Ctr Zoonot Dis Wildlife, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Rd, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
[5] Mahidol Univ, Fac Vet Sci, Dept Clin Sci & Publ Hlth, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Rd, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
[6] US Geol Survey, Natl Wildlife Hlth Ctr, 6006 Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI 53711 USA
[7] 810 S Gammon Rd, Madison, WI 53719 USA
关键词
Wildlife disease surveillance; One health; Thailand; Survey; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES; GLOBAL TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100600
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Coordinated wildlife disease surveillance (WDS) can help professionals across disciplines effectively safeguard human, animal, and environmental health. The aims of this study were to understand how WDS in Thailand is utilized, valued, and can be improved within a One Health framework. An online questionnaire was distributed to 183 professionals (55.7% response rate) across Thailand working in wildlife, marine animal, livestock, domestic animal, zoo animal, environmental, and public health sectors. Twelve semi-structured interviews with key professionals were then performed. Three-quarters of survey respondents reported using WDS data and information. Sectors agreed upon ranking disease control (76.5% of respondents) as the most beneficial outcome of WDS, while fostering new ideas through collaboration was valued by few participants (2.0%). Accessing data collected by one's own sector was identified as the most challenging (50%) yet least difficult to improve (88.3%). Having legal authority to conduct WDS was the second most frequently identified challenge. Interviewees explained that legal documentation required for cross-institutional collaborations posed a barrier to efficient communication and use of human resources. Survey respondents identified allocation of human resources (75.5%), adequate budget (71.6%), and having a clear communication system between sectors (71.6%) as highest priority areas for improvement to WDS in Thailand. Authorization from administrative officials and support from local community members were identified as challenges during in-person interviews. Future outreach may be directed toward these groups. As 42.9% of marine health professionals had difficulty knowing whom to contact in other sectors and 28.4% of survey respondents indicated that communication with marine health professionals was not applicable to their work, connecting the marine sector with other sectors may be prioritized. This study identifies priorities for addressing current challenges in the establishment of a general WDS system and information management system in Thailand while presenting a model for such evaluation in other regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementing wildlife disease surveillance in the Netherlands, a One Health approach
    Maas, M.
    Grone, A.
    Kuiken, T.
    van Schaik, G.
    Roest, H. I. J.
    van der Giessen, J. W. B.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2016, 35 (03): : 863 - 874
  • [2] Capacity building efforts and perceptions for wildlife surveillance to detect zoonotic pathogens: comparing stakeholder perspectives
    Schwind, Jessica S.
    Goldstein, Tracey
    Thomas, Kate
    Mazet, Jonna A. K.
    Smith, Woutrina A.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [3] An operational framework for wildlife health in the One Health approach An operational framework for wildlife health in the One Health approach
    Goulet, C.
    de Garine-Wichatitsky, M.
    Chardonnet, P.
    de Klerk, L. -M.
    Kock, R.
    Muset, S.
    Suu-Ire, R.
    Caron, A.
    ONE HEALTH, 2024, 19
  • [4] Enhancing global health security in Thailand: Strengths and challenges of initiating a One Health approach to avian influenza surveillance
    Innes, Gabriel K.
    Lambrou, Anastasia S.
    Thumrin, Pornchai
    Thukngamdee, Yupawat
    Tangwangvivat, Ratanaporn
    Doungngern, Pawinee
    Noradechanon, Kirana
    Netrabukkana, Punnaporn
    Meidenbauer, Karen
    Mehoke, Thomas
    Heaney, Christopher D.
    Hinjoy, Soawapak
    Elayadi, Anissa N.
    ONE HEALTH, 2022, 14
  • [5] Two decades of one health surveillance of Nipah virus in Thailand
    Wacharapluesadee, Supaporn
    Ghai, Siriporn
    Duengkae, Prateep
    Manee-Orn, Pattarapol
    Thanapongtharm, Weerapong
    Saraya, Abhinbhen W.
    Yingsakmongkon, Sangchai
    Joyjinda, Yutthana
    Suradhat, Sanipa
    Ampoot, Weenassarin
    Nuansrichay, Bundit
    Kaewpom, Thongchai
    Tantilertcharoen, Rachod
    Rodpan, Apaporn
    Wongsathapornchai, Kachen
    Ponpinit, Teerada
    Buathong, Rome
    Bunprakob, Saowalak
    Damrongwatanapokin, Sudarat
    Ruchiseesarod, Chanida
    Petcharat, Sininat
    Kalpravidh, Wantanee
    Olival, Kevin J.
    Stokes, Martha M.
    Hemachudha, Thiravat
    ONE HEALTH OUTLOOK, 2021, 3 (01):
  • [6] Two decades of one health surveillance of Nipah virus in Thailand
    Supaporn Wacharapluesadee
    Siriporn Ghai
    Prateep Duengkae
    Pattarapol Manee-Orn
    Weerapong Thanapongtharm
    Abhinbhen W. Saraya
    Sangchai Yingsakmongkon
    Yutthana Joyjinda
    Sanipa Suradhat
    Weenassarin Ampoot
    Bundit Nuansrichay
    Thongchai Kaewpom
    Rachod Tantilertcharoen
    Apaporn Rodpan
    Kachen Wongsathapornchai
    Teerada Ponpinit
    Rome Buathong
    Saowalak Bunprakob
    Sudarat Damrongwatanapokin
    Chanida Ruchiseesarod
    Sininat Petcharat
    Wantanee Kalpravidh
    Kevin J. Olival
    Martha M. Stokes
    Thiravat Hemachudha
    One Health Outlook, 3
  • [7] One health surveillance strategy for coronaviruses in Italian wildlife
    Leopardi, Stefania
    Desiato, Rosanna
    Mazzucato, Matteo
    Orusa, Riccardo
    Obber, Federica
    Averaimo, Daniela
    Berjaoui, Shadia
    Canziani, Sabrina
    Capucchio, Maria Teresa
    Conti, Raffaella
    di Bella, Santina
    Festa, Francesca
    Garofalo, Luisa
    Lelli, Davide
    Madrau, Maria Paola
    Mandola, Maria Lucia
    Martin, Ana Maria Moreno
    Peletto, Simone
    Pirani, Silvia
    Robetto, Serena
    Torresi, Claudia
    Varotto, Maria
    Citterio, Carlo
    Terregino, Calogero
    EPIDEMIOLOGY & INFECTION, 2023, 151
  • [8] Capacity building efforts and perceptions for wildlife surveillance to detect zoonotic pathogens: comparing stakeholder perspectives
    Jessica S Schwind
    Tracey Goldstein
    Kate Thomas
    Jonna AK Mazet
    Woutrina A Smith
    BMC Public Health, 14
  • [9] Integration of wildlife and environmental health into a One Health approach
    Sleeman, J. M.
    Richgels, K. L. D.
    White, C. L.
    Stephen, C.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2019, 38 (01): : 91 - 102
  • [10] Q fever prevention in Australia: general practitioner and stakeholder perspectives on preparedness and the potential of a One Health approach
    Rahaman, Md R.
    Hodgetts, Katherine
    Milazzo, Adriana
    Marshall, Helen
    Chaber, Anne-Lise
    Crabb, Deane
    Bi, Peng
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 46 (02) : 196 - 202