Antecedents and outcomes of work engagement among nursing staff in long-term care facilities-A systematic review

被引:6
作者
Midje, Hilde Hovda [1 ,4 ]
Nyborg, Vibeke Narverud [2 ]
Nordsteien, Anita [3 ]
overgard, Kjell Ivar [1 ]
Brembo, Espen Andreas [3 ]
Torp, Steffen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Hlth Social & Welf Studies, Res Grp Hlth Promot Settings, Borre, Norway
[2] Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Nursing & Hlth Sci, Drammen, Norway
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Ctr Hlth & Technol, Drammen, Norway
[4] Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Hlth Social & Welf Studies, Res Grp Hlth Promot Settings, Raveien 215, N-3184 Borre, Norway
关键词
health promotion; JD-R model; job demands; job resources; long-term care; nursing; occupational; systematic review; work engagement; working environment; JOB-SATISFACTION; NURSES; DEMANDS; RESOURCES; TURNOVER; BURNOUT;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15804
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To determine antecedents and outcomes of work engagement (WE) among nursing staff in long-term care (LTC) using the Job Demand-Resources model. Design: A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis in systematic reviews guideline. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022336736). Data Sources: The initial searches were performed in PsycInfo, Medline, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL and Scopus and yielded 3050 unique publications. Updated searches identified another 335 publications. Sixteen studies published from 2010 to 2022 were included. Review Methods: The screening of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full-text publications, was performed blinded by two author teams using the inclusion/exclusion criteria. When needed, a mutual consensus was obtained through discussion within and across the teams. A descriptive and narrative synthesis without a meta-analysis of the included studies was performed. Results: The extent of research on WE in LTC facilities is limited and the factors examined are heterogeneous. Of forty-two unique antecedents and outcomes, only three factors were assessed in three or more studies. Antecedents-in particular job resources-are more commonly examined than outcomes. Conclusion: Existing literature offers scant evidence on antecedents and outcomes of WE among nursing staff in LTC facilities. Social support, learning and development opportunities and person-centred processes are the most examined factors, yet with ambiguous results. Impact: Antecedents and outcomes of engagement among nursing staff in LTC facilities have not previously been reviewed systematically. Engagement has been correlated with both more efficient and higher-quality service delivery. Our findings suggest opportunities to improve health and care services by enhancing engagement, whilst at the same time better caring for employees. This study lays the groundwork for more detailed research into the contributing factors and potential results of increasing caregivers' engagement.No patient or public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 59
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Promoting patient care: work engagement as a mediator between ward service climate and patient-centred care [J].
Abdelhadi, Nasra ;
Drach-Zahavy, Anat .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2012, 68 (06) :1276-1287
[2]   Individual and organizational factors of nurses' job satisfaction in long-term care: A systematic review [J].
Aloisio, Laura D. ;
Coughlin, Mary ;
Squires, Janet E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 123
[3]   Factors Associated With Nurses' Job Satisfaction In Residential Long-term Care: The Importance of Organizational Context [J].
Aloisio, Laura D. ;
Gifford, Wendy A. ;
McGilton, Katherine S. ;
Lalonde, Michelle ;
Estabrooks, Carole A. ;
Squires, Janet E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 20 (12) :1611-+
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Health and care workforce in Europe: time to act
[5]   The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis [J].
Bailey, Catherine ;
Madden, Adrian ;
Alfes, Kerstin ;
Fletcher, Luke .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (01) :31-53
[6]  
Bakker A. B., 2008, Career Development International, V13, P209, DOI DOI 10.1108/13620430810870476
[7]  
Bakker AB., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P309, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[8]   Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD-R Approach [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Demerouti, Evangelia ;
Isabel Sanz-Vergel, Ana .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 1, 2014, 1 :389-411
[9]   Structure Please; Continuous Improvement and Employee Consequences in a Dynamic Task Environment [J].
Benders, Jos ;
Bal, Michiel ;
Vermeerbergen, Lander .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
[10]   Bottom-Up Interventions Effective in Promoting Work Engagement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Bjork, Janina M. ;
Bolander, Pernilla ;
Forsman, Anna K. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12