The neural correlates of continuous feedback processing

被引:3
作者
Hassall, Cameron D. [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Hunt, Laurence T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[2] MacEwan Univ, Dept Psychol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
dopamine; EEG; ERP; feedback; reward; stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN); REGRESSION-BASED ESTIMATION; REWARD ANTICIPATION; DOPAMINE SIGNALS; PREDICTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.14399
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Feedback processing is commonly studied by analyzing the brain's response to discrete rather than continuous events. Such studies have led to the hypothesis that rapid phasic midbrain dopaminergic activity tracks reward prediction errors (RPEs), the effects of which are measurable at the scalp via electroencephalography (EEG). Although studies using continuous feedback are sparse, recent animal work suggests that moment-to-moment changes in reward are tracked by slowly ramping midbrain dopaminergic activity. Some have argued that these ramping signals index state values rather than RPEs. Our goal here was to develop an EEG measure of continuous feedback processing in humans, then test whether its behavior could be accounted for by the RPE hypothesis. Participants completed a stimulus-response learning task in which a continuous reward cue gradually increased or decreased over time. A regression-based unmixing approach revealed EEG activity with a topography and time course consistent with the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), a scalp potential previously linked to reward anticipation and tonic dopamine release. Importantly, this reward-related activity depended on outcome expectancy: as predicted by the RPE hypothesis, activity for expected reward cues was reduced compared to unexpected reward cues. These results demonstrate the possibility of using human scalp-recorded potentials to track continuous feedback processing, and test candidate hypotheses of this activity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436
  • [2] Brunia C.H., 2012, Oxofrd Handbook of ERP Componentns, P189, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195374148.013.0108
  • [3] Burns MD, 2013, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P1680, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609841
  • [4] The Brain Network of Expectancy and Uncertainty Processing
    Catena, Andres
    Perales, Jose C.
    Megias, Alberto
    Candido, Antonio
    Jara, Elvia
    Maldonado, Antonio
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07):
  • [5] The Multivariate Temporal Response Function (mTRF) Toolbox: A MATLAB Toolbox for Relating Neural Signals to Continuous Stimuli
    Crosse, Michael J.
    Di Liberto, Giovanni M.
    Bednar, Adam
    Lalor, Edmund C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [6] The New Statistics: Why and How
    Cumming, Geoff
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (01) : 7 - 29
  • [7] EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis
    Delorme, A
    Makeig, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) : 9 - 21
  • [8] Unfold: an integrated toolbox for overlap correction, non-linear modeling, and regression-based EEG analysis
    Ehinger, Benedikt, V
    Dimigen, Olaf
    [J]. PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [9] Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons
    Fiorillo, CD
    Tobler, PN
    Schultz, W
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5614) : 1898 - 1902
  • [10] Genetic variation in dopamine moderates neural response during reward anticipation and delivery: Evidence from event-related potentials
    Foti, Dan
    Hajcak, Greg
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (05) : 617 - 626