Predicting the influence of geometric imperfections on the mechanical response of 2D and 3D periodic trusses

被引:15
|
作者
Glaesener, R. N. [1 ]
Kumar, S. [3 ]
Lestringant, C. [4 ]
Butruille, T. [2 ]
Portela, C. M. [2 ]
Kochmann, D. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Mech & Proc Engn, Mech & Mat Lab, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Mekelweg 2, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
[4] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Alembert, F-75005 Paris, France
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Truss; Imperfection; Elasticity; Metamaterial; Finite element method; Machine learning; POROUS BIOMATERIALS; DEFECT SENSITIVITY; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; BONE-REPLACEMENT; LATTICE; STRENGTH; STIFFNESS; TOPOLOGY; MODELS; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118918
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Although architected materials based on truss networks have been shown to possess advantageous or extreme mechanical properties, those can be highly affected by tolerances and uncertainties in the manufacturing process, which are usually neglected during the design phase. Deterministic computational tools typically design structures with the assumption of perfect, defect-free architectures, while experiments have confirmed the inevitable presence of imperfections and their possibly detrimental impact on the effective properties. Information about the nature and expected magnitude of geometric defects that emerge from the additive manufacturing processes would allow for new designs that aim to mitigate (or at least account for) the effects of defects and to reduce the uncertainty in the effective properties. To this end, we here investigate the effects of four most commonly found types of geometric imperfections in trusses, applied to eleven representative truss topologies in two and three dimensions. Through our study, we (i) quantify the impact of imperfections on the effective stiffness through computational homogenization, (ii) examine the sensitivity of the various truss topologies with respect to those imperfections, (iii) demonstrate the applicability of the model through experiments on 3D-printed trusses, and (iv) present a machine learning framework to predict the presence of defects in a given truss architecture based merely on its mechanical response.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical investigation of the mechanical properties of 2D and 3D auxetic structures
    Orhan, Suleyman Nazif
    Erden, Seydanur
    SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [2] Damage identification of 2D and 3D trusses by using complete and incomplete noisy measurements
    Rezaiee-Pajand, M.
    Kazemiyan, M. S.
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2014, 52 (01) : 149 - 172
  • [3] 2D or Not 2D? Testing the Utility of 2D Vs. 3D Landmark Data in Geometric Morphometrics of the Sculpin Subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces; Cottoidea)
    Buser, Thaddaeus J.
    Sidlauskas, Brian L.
    Summers, Adam P.
    ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2018, 301 (05): : 806 - 818
  • [4] Rapid 2D to 3D conversion
    Harman, P
    Flack, J
    Fox, S
    Dowley, M
    STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS IX, 2002, 4660 : 78 - 86
  • [5] Discretization in 2D and 3D orders
    Couprie, M
    Bertrand, G
    Kenmochi, Y
    GRAPHICAL MODELS, 2003, 65 (1-3) : 77 - 91
  • [6] solveTruss v1.0: Static, global buckling and frequency analysis of 2D and 3D trusses with Mathematica
    Ozbasaran, Hakan
    SOFTWAREX, 2017, 6 : 135 - 140
  • [7] Influence of 3D spatial effect of underground structure on the nonlinear seismic response of subway station based on the comparison of 2D and 3D models
    Jin, Liguo
    Du, Liting
    Zhou, Wen
    Chen, Su
    Zhou, Zhenghua
    Zhou, Bengang
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 139
  • [8] Culturing substrates influence the morphological, mechanical and biochemical features of lung adenocarcinoma cells cultured in 2D or 3D
    Prina-Mello, Adriele
    Jain, Namrata
    Liu, Baiyun
    Kilpatrick, Jason I.
    Tutty, Melissa A.
    Bell, Alan P.
    Jarvis, Suzanne P.
    Volkov, Yuri
    Movia, Dania
    TISSUE & CELL, 2018, 50 : 15 - 30
  • [9] On advances in differential-geometric approaches for 2D and 3D shape analyses and activity recognition
    Srivastava, Anuj
    Turaga, Pavan
    Kurtek, Sebastian
    IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 2012, 30 (6-7) : 398 - 416
  • [10] Topology of 2D and 3D rational curves
    Gerardo Alcazar, Juan
    Maria Diaz-Toca, Gema
    COMPUTER AIDED GEOMETRIC DESIGN, 2010, 27 (07) : 483 - 502