A CAR-PROMETHEE-based multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainability assessment of renewable energy technologies in Morocco

被引:12
作者
Gouraizim, Mohamed [1 ]
Makan, Abdelhadi [1 ]
El Ouarghi, Hossain [1 ]
机构
[1] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Natl Sch Appl Sci ENSAH, Team Environm Management & Civil Engn GEGC, Tetouan, Morocco
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making; Renewable energy technologies; Sustainability criteria; PROMETHEE method; Cardinal ranking; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SELECTION; RESOURCES; ALTERNATIVES; SYSTEMS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1007/s12063-023-00361-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
With the goal of becoming a regional leader in clean energy, Morocco has invested heavily in renewable energy mega-projects over the last decade, including the Noor-Ouarzazate complex, the largest concentrated solar power (CSP) plant in the world. To continue accelerating its energy transition and achieve renewable energy targets by 2030, Morocco should focus on small-, medium-, and large-scale projects. However, choosing the most sustainable renewable energy technology (RET) is a complex decision-making problem. This study proposes a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for the sustainability assessment of RETs in Morocco. By evaluating the existing RETs (wind, CSP, solar PV, hydro, and biomass) in terms of environmental, economic, technical, and social criteria, the study aims to assist decision-makers in selecting the most sustainable option. The cardinal (CAR) method was used to elicit criteria weights, with economic (30.7% of weight) and environmental (29% of weight) criteria being prioritized. The PROMETHEE method was then used to rank the alternatives, with solar PV emerging as the most sustainable technology, followed by wind, hydro, CPS, and lastly biomass. It should be noted that the PROMETHEE I partial ranking indicated that wind and hydro were both ranked second in terms of sustainability, highlighting the need for careful consideration when choosing between these two options. The study also found that the rankings were similar using both linear and Gaussian preference functions with different thresholds.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1358
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   A comprehensive review on applications of multicriteria decision-making methods in power and energy systems [J].
Bohra, Shabbir S. ;
Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (04) :4088-4118
[12]  
Brans JP, 2005, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V78, P163, DOI 10.1007/b100605
[13]   A novel renewable energy selection model for United Nations' sustainable development goals [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Karabulut, Yagmur ;
Mukul, Esin .
ENERGY, 2018, 165 :290-302
[14]   Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Guleryuz, Sezin .
ENERGY, 2017, 123 :149-163
[15]   Multistage Decision Framework for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources Based on Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE [J].
Chen, Ting ;
Wang, Yi-ting ;
Wang, Jian-qiang ;
Li, Lin ;
Cheng, Peng-Fei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 22 (05) :1535-1551
[16]   The hierarchical SMAA-PROMETHEE method applied to assess the sustainability of European cities [J].
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Greco, Salvatore ;
Leonardi, Floriana ;
Slowinski, Roman .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 51 (09) :6430-6448
[17]   A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects [J].
da Cunha, Richard Alex ;
Rangel, Luis Alberto Duncan ;
Rudolf, Christian A. ;
dos Santos, Luiza .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 9
[18]   Using AHP-PROMOTHEE for Selection of Best Low-Impact Development Designs for Urban Flood Mitigation [J].
Dadrasajirlou, Yashar ;
Karami, Hojat ;
Mirjalili, Seyedali .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (01) :375-402
[19]   The CAR Method for Using Preference Strength in Multi-criteria Decision Making [J].
Danielson, Mats ;
Ekenberg, Love .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2016, 25 (04) :775-797
[20]   Evaluation of the maturity level of biomass electricity generation technologies using the technology readiness level criteria [J].
Dovichi Filho, Fernando Bruno ;
Santiago, York Castillo ;
Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva ;
Palacio, Carlos Escobar ;
del Olmo, Oscar Agustin Almazan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 295