A quasi-2D exploration of optimum design settings for geotextile-reinforced sand in assistance with PIV analysis of failure mechanism

被引:9
作者
Ates, Bayram [1 ]
Sadoglu, Erol [1 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkiye
关键词
Bearing capacity ratio; Settlement reduction factor; Particle image velocimetry technique; Failure mechanism; Reinforced soil; Tensile strength of geotextile; ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY; STRIP FOOTINGS; SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS; SQUARE FOOTINGS; MODEL; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; TESTS; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.01.005
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Many earlier studies were focused on testing different types of geosynthetics to investigate effect of reinforce-ment on bearing capacity, but the effect of tensile strength on the failure mechanism has not been examined sufficiently. Within this scope, a test setup was prepared to apply strip loads on densely compacted reinforced sand under the plane strain condition. The tank containing the reinforced sand was a rectangular prism with perfect transparency, and its interior dimensions were 960 x 200 x 650 mm3. Firstly, optimum values of design variables (depth of first sheet, length and number of sheets, space between sheets, tensile strength of sheets) for the woven geotextile reinforced sand were determined experimentally. Then, the failure mechanisms of the soil, which were reinforced with geotextiles of different tensile strengths, were observed and analyzed with particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique. Consequently, the failure mechanism of the sand with a single geotextile reinforcement was similar to general shear failure of unreinforced soil. Contrarily, the failure surfaces were deeper and longer. Additionally, the deep-footing mechanism reached out large depth in the case of four rein-forcement layers. The failure mechanism converted into a punching type due to a hypothetic increase in the bearing depth of reinforcement.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 436
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand
    Abu-Farsakh, Murad
    Chen, Qiming
    Sharma, Radhey
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2013, 53 (02) : 335 - 348
  • [2] Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations
    Adams, MT
    Collin, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [3] Andersen K., OPTIMIZATION LOW MEL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, D4595 ASTM INT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, ASTM D 854-10
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, D3080M11 ASTM INT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, ASTM committee E17-52 on traffic monitoring, DOI [10.1520/D6913_D6913M-17, 10.1520/D6913D6913M-17, DOI 10.1520/D6913_D6913M-17]
  • [8] [Anonymous], CW CNT ENHANCED COMP
  • [9] ASTM, 2016, ASTM-D4253-16e1, DOI DOI 10.1520/D4253-16
  • [10] Circular footings resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed
    Basudhar, P. K.
    Saha, Santanu
    Deb, Kousik
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2007, 25 (06) : 377 - 384