Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework

被引:8
作者
Suzuki, Etsuji [1 ,2 ]
Yamamoto, Eiji [3 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Okayama Univ Sci, Okayama 7000005, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
attributable fraction; counterfactual model; excess fraction; preventable fraction; prevented fraction; vaccine efficacy; CAUSE MODELS; BIAS; DEFINITION; FIELD; RISK;
D O I
10.1515/jci-2021-0068
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The attributable fraction (population) has attracted much attention from a theoretical perspective and has been used extensively to assess the impact of potential health interventions. However, despite its extensive use, there is much confusion about its concept and calculation methods. In this article, we discuss the concepts of and calculation methods for the attributable fraction and related measures in the counterfactual framework, both with and without stratification by covariates. Generally, the attributable fraction is useful when the exposure of interest has a causal effect on the outcome. However, it is important to understand that this statement applies to the exposed group. Although the target population of the attributable fraction (population) is the total population, the causal effect should be present not in the total population but in the exposed group. As related measures, we discuss the preventable fraction and prevented fraction, which are generally useful when the exposure of interest has a preventive effect on the outcome, and we further propose a new measure called the attributed fraction. We also discuss the causal and preventive excess fractions, and provide notes on vaccine efficacy. Finally, we discuss the relations between the aforementioned six measures and six possible patterns using a conceptual schema.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk [J].
Benichou, J .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (03) :195-216
[2]  
Boslaugh S., 2008, Encyclopedia of epidemiology
[3]   The Consistency Statement in Causal Inference A Definition or an Assumption? [J].
Cole, Stephen R. ;
Frangakis, Constantine E. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (01) :3-5
[4]   Errors in Estimating Adjusted Attributable Fractions [J].
Darrow, Lyndsey A. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (06) :917-918
[5]   Confounding and Bias in the Attributable Fraction [J].
Darrow, Lyndsey A. ;
Steenland, N. Kyle .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) :53-58
[6]  
DOLL R, 1951, Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum, V7, P39
[7]   On the relationship of sufficient component cause models with potential outcome (counterfactual) models [J].
Flanders, W. Dana .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 (12) :847-853
[8]   Bias in Calculation of Attributable Fractions Using Relative Risks from Nonsmokers Only [J].
Flegal, Katherine M. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (06) :913-916
[9]   Methods of calculating deaths attributable to obesity [J].
Flegal, KM ;
Graubard, BI ;
Williamson, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 160 (04) :331-338
[10]  
Fox MP., 2021, MODERN EPIDEMIOLOGY, V4th, P805