Planning for Program Evaluation Improves Implementation and Assessment

被引:0
作者
Tower, Leslie E. [1 ,2 ]
Patrick, Julie Hicks [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, WVU Womens Resource Ctr WRC, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Sch Social Work, Morgantown, WV USA
[3] AGE ADAR Scholars Program, Morgantown, WV USA
[4] West Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV USA
[5] 53 Campus Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
ADAR; training; gerontologists; MSTEM;
D O I
10.1177/00914150241235127
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
This article offers a general approach to plan and implement an educational program by illustrating the evaluation process and data from the AGE-ADAR Scholars Program. A well-designed program evaluation will also include a plan for stakeholder dissemination. We adapted a framework from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention which includes hard and soft outcomes. Hard outcomes include improved academic metrics, including test scores and graduation rates. Soft outcomes include changes in students' attitudes, particularly those related to reduced ageism as well as readiness to pursue graduate study. While our hard and soft outcomes suggest that the ADAR program is effective in increasing interest in rural health disparities and aging research, we are hopeful that our impact will continue to enrich the lives of our students and the communities in which they live and work.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 408
页数:10
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, MMWR, V48, P1
  • [2] A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Health, Safety, and Greening Vacant Urban Space
    Branas, Charles C.
    Cheney, Rose A.
    MacDonald, John M.
    Tam, Vicky W.
    Jackson, Tara D.
    Ten Have, Thomas R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 174 (11) : 1296 - 1306
  • [3] Rossi P., 2018, Evaluation: a systematic approach, V8
  • [4] Stott L., 2009, STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEME