The December 2020 magnitude (Mw) 6.4 Petrinja earthquake, Croatia: seismological aspects, emergency response and impacts

被引:8
作者
Atalic, Josip [1 ]
Demsic, Marija [1 ]
Banicek, Maja [2 ]
Uros, Mario [1 ]
Dasovic, Iva [3 ]
Prevolnik, Snjezan [3 ]
Kadic, Alen [2 ]
Novak, Marta Savor [1 ]
Nastev, Miroslav [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Dept Engn Mech, Fac Civil Engn, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Croatian Ctr Earthquake Engn, Fac Civil Engn, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Dept Geophys, Fac Sci, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Geol Survey Canada, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
Physical damage; Masonry buildings; Emergency response; Post-earthquake survey; Social impacts; SEISMICITY; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-023-01758-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
On December 29, 2020, nine months after the March Mw 5.4 Zagreb earthquake and amidst the COVID-19 lockdown, a devastating Mw 6.4 earthquake struck near the town of Petrinja, about 50 km SE from the country's capital Zagreb. It was preceded by the Mw 4.9 foreshock from the day before. The main shock claimed 7 fatalities and caused widespread damage. Historical centers of nearby cities with invaluable heritage buildings were significantly affected as were the many residential buildings, built mainly of unreinforced masonry. Damage was observed as far as 60 km from the epicenter. This paper summarizes the seismological aspects of the Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake, the emergency response and the main impacts to people and buildings. The description and findings are based on the field observations and a series of post-earthquake activities led by the team of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb. Typical damage to buildings and usability data are presented with examples based on 50,000 inspection results. By far the most affected were the unreinforced masonry buildings, followed by confined masonry, whereas reinforced concrete buildings were the least affected. The total direct and indirect losses are estimated to 4.8 billion EUR. The provided information represents a useful basis and impetus for improving emergency action and long-term disaster reduction plans in other regions with similar building exposure and seismotectonic settings.
引用
收藏
页码:5767 / 5808
页数:42
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [31] Herak M., 2011, SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS
  • [32] Herak M., 2020, SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS
  • [33] Properties of the Petrinja (Croatia) earthquake sequence of 2020-2021-Results of seismological research for the first six months of activity
    Herak, Marijan
    Herak, Davorka
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2023, 858
  • [34] Ivancic I., 2002, Geofizika, V18, P17
  • [35] Ivancic I., 2006, Geofizika, V23, P1
  • [36] Seismicity of Croatia in the period 2006-2015
    Ivancic, Ines
    Herak, Davorka
    Herak, Marijan
    Allegretti, Ivo
    Fiket, Tomislav
    Kuk, Kresimir
    Markusic, Snjezana
    Prevolnik, Snjezan
    Sovic, Ivica
    Dasovic, Iva
    Stipcevic, Josip
    [J]. GEOFIZIKA, 2018, 35 (01) : 69 - 98
  • [37] Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings
    Lagomarsino, Sergio
    Giovinazzi, Sonia
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 4 (04) : 415 - 443
  • [38] Seismic zoning of Croatia
    Markusic, S
    Herak, M
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 1998, 18 (03) : 269 - 285
  • [39] Miklin Z, 2019, Seismic and geological microzonation of a part of the city of Zagreb, Book 1-Seismic and geological microzonation
  • [40] Miletic D., 2014, Godisnjak Hrvatskoga restauratorskog zavoda, V5, P49