Cost effectiveness of induction of labour at 41 versus 42 weeks of gestation

被引：0
作者：
Ahmed, Rubayyi [1 ]
Ahmed, Sheikh Mohammad [1 ]
Rauf, Sameer Abdul [1 ]
Baig, Rooha [1 ]
机构：
[1] Liaquat Natl Med Coll, Karachi, Pakistan
来源：
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 2023年
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/1471-0528.17661
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：1
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Alkmark, M.
    Wennerholm, U-B
    Saltvedt, S.
    Bergh, C.
    Carlsson, Y.
    Elden, H.
    Fadl, H.
    Jonsson, M.
    Ladfors, L.
    Sengpiel, V
    Wesstrom, J.
    Hagberg, H.
    Svensson, M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (13) : 2157 - 2165
  • [2] Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis
    不详
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 20 (65) : 1 - +
  • [3] Maternal and neonatal outcome following prolonged labor induction
    Bahn, SA
    Jacobson, J
    Petersen, F
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (03) : 403 - 407
  • [4] Does induction of labor at 41 weeks (early, mid or late) improve birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancy? A nationwide propensity score-matched study
    Ravelli, Anita C. J.
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    de Groot, Christianne J. M.
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    Eskes, Martine
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (05) : 612 - 625
1