Optimal allocation of nature-based solutions to achieve climate mitigation and adaptation goals

被引:3
作者
Villarreal-Rosas, Jaramar [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Rhodes, Jonathan R. [1 ,2 ]
Sonter, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [2 ,3 ]
Vogl, Adrian L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Stanford Univ, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
carbon sequestration; disaggregation of beneficiaries; ecosystem services; Nepal; sediment retention; spatial prioritization; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; TRADE-OFFS; CARBON; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10481
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Nature -based solutions (NbS) can prevent further climate change and increase local communities' capacity to adapt to the current impacts of climate change. However, the benefits obtained from implementing NbS are not distributed equally across people. Thus, it is key to further understand how people are im- pacted when implementing NbS.2. We developed a multi-objective prioritization approach to identify changes in (i) the biophysical provision of ecosystem services, (ii) optimal allocation of NbS and (iii) monetary benefits when targeting climate mitigation versus climate adapta- tion goals. We used the increase in metric tons of carbon storage as representa- tive of climate mitigation and the decrease in on -site and downstream tons of sediment per year as representative of climate adaptation.3. Planning strategies that target climate mitigation or climate adaptation goals sep- arately represent a loss of between 30% and 60% of the maximum possible car- bon sequestration or sediment retention benefits. Conversely, targeting climate mitigation and climate adaptation goals at the same time captured more than 90% of the maximum possible benefits for all objectives.4. Priority NbS in the mitigation planning strategy included soil and water conserva- tion and forest rehabilitation, while priority NbS in the adaptation planning strat- egy included grassland rehabilitation and hill terrace improvement.5. Targeting mitigation and adaptation goals at the same time captures 35M USD (89% of the maximum attainable) in value of carbon restored and retained, and 2M USD (100% of the maximum attainable) of avoided maintenance costs to the KGA hydropower plant. Conversely, failing to incorporate adaptation goals when developing climate plans only captures 1M of avoided maintenance costs to the KGA hydropower plant.6. Our approach can be replicated in other locations to promote cost-effective in- vestments in NbS able to secure both global and local benefits to people. This can improve the outcomes of international climate change financial schemes like the Green Climate Fund and the UN- REDD+ program.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1045
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Reducing or creating poverty? Analyzing livelihood impacts of forest carbon projects with evidence from India [J].
Aggarwal, Ashish ;
Brockington, Dan .
LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 95
[2]   Natural climate solutions are not enough [J].
Anderson, Christa M. ;
DeFries, Ruth S. ;
Litterman, Robert ;
Matson, Pamela A. ;
Nepstad, Daniel C. ;
Pacala, Stephen ;
Schlesinger, William H. ;
Shaw, M. Rebecca ;
Smith, Pete ;
Weber, Christopher ;
Field, Christopher B. .
SCIENCE, 2019, 363 (6430) :933-934
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, J ENVIRON LAW, V10, P215
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan
[5]   Developing a sustainable agro-system for central Nepal using reduced tillage and straw mulching [J].
Atreya, Kishor ;
Sharma, Subodh ;
Bajracharya, Roshan M. ;
Rajbhandari, Neeranjan P. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) :547-555
[6]   Towards reliable extreme weather and climate event attribution [J].
Bellprat, Omar ;
Guemas, Virginie ;
Doblas-Reyes, Francisco ;
Donat, Markus G. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[7]   Assessments of ecosystem service indicators and stakeholder's willingness to pay for selected ecosystem services in the Chure region of Nepal [J].
Bhandari, Pratima ;
Mohan, K. C. ;
Shrestha, Sujata ;
Aryal, Achyut ;
Shrestha, Uttam Babu .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 69 :25-34
[8]   The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation? [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Satterfield, Terre .
PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (04) :1021-1060
[9]   Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Guerry, Anne D. ;
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Basurto, Xavier ;
Bostrom, Ann ;
Chuenpagdee, Ratana ;
Gould, Rachelle ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Hannahs, Neil ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Norton, Bryan ;
Ruckelshaus, Mary ;
Russell, Roly ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Woodside, Ulalia .
BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (08) :744-756
[10]   Does terracing enhance soil organic carbon sequestration? A national-scale data analysis in China [J].
Chen, Die ;
Wei, Wei ;
Daryanto, Stefani ;
Tarolli, Paolo .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 721