Responsible natural language processing: A principlist framework for social benefits

被引:8
作者
Behera, Rajat Kumar [1 ]
Bala, Pradip Kumar [2 ]
Rana, Nripendra P. [3 ]
Irani, Zahir [4 ]
机构
[1] Kalinga Inst Ind Technol KIIT Deemed be Univ, Sch Comp Engn, KIIT Rd, Bhubaneswar 751024, Orissa, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Ranchi, Area Informat Syst & Business Analyt, Nayasarai Rd,Prabandhan Nagar, Ranchi 835303, Jharkhand, India
[3] Qatar Univ, Coll Business & Econ, POB 2713, Doha, Qatar
[4] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Richmond Rd, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Responsible NLP; Ethical work climate; Social benefits; Responsible decision making; Ethics; DECISION-MAKING; ETHICAL CLIMATE; POISONING ATTACKS; TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS; IMPACT; FAIR; ACCOUNTABILITY; TRANSPARENCY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122306
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Businesses harness the power of natural language processing (NLP) to automate processes and make data-driven decisions. However, NLP raises concerns on a number of fronts due to its potential for disruption, which can be addressed with the assignment of responsibility. Therefore, responsible NLP (RNLP) can be designed as a principlist framework to ensure NLP systems are used in an ethical manner. The study proposes a principlist framework with the formulation of eight principlist ethical principles to ensure NLP is safe, secure and reliable for responsible decision making and subsequently results in social benefits. Using snowball sampling, data are collected from 15 informants, who represent senior-level positions in diversified industries. The analysis is performed with qualitative research methodology. The result produces two ethical practices. First is the adoption of RNLP as a disruptive technology for ethical decision making for social benefits and second is the creation of a culture of responsibility.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 169 条
[51]  
Doran D, 2017, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1710.00794
[52]  
Dubnick M.J., 2003, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, V6, P405, DOI [DOI 10.1108/IJOTB-06-03-2003-B002, 10.1108/ijotb-06-03-2003-b002]
[53]   Ethical imperatives for legal educators to promote law student wellbeing [J].
Duncan, Nigel ;
Field, Rachael ;
Strevens, Caroline .
LEGAL ETHICS, 2020, 23 (1-2) :65-88
[54]   Manager perceptions of big data reliability in hotel revenue management decision making [J].
Egan, David ;
Haynes, Natalie Claire .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (01) :25-39
[55]   Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges [J].
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ;
Graebner, Melissa E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (01) :25-32
[56]   GRAND CHALLENGES AND INDUCTIVE METHODS: RIGOR WITHOUT RIGOR MORTIS [J].
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ;
Graebner, Melissa E. ;
Sonenshein, Scott .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 59 (04) :1113-1123
[57]   Battle in the name of privacy and security: A comment on Tencent vs. Qihoo (Supreme People's Court of China 2014) [J].
Fei Lanfang ;
Zhou Peng .
COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2014, 30 (05) :586-592
[58]   SecureNLP: A System for Multi-Party Privacy-Preserving Natural Language Processing [J].
Feng, Qi ;
He, Debiao ;
Liu, Zhe ;
Wang, Huaqun ;
Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2020, 15 :3709-3721
[59]   A metacognitive decision making based-framework for bank customer loyalty measurement and management [J].
Ferreira, Fernando A. F. ;
Jalali, Marjan S. ;
Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva ;
Viana, Bianca A. C. P. .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2015, 21 (02) :280-300
[60]  
Field A., 2021, P 1 WORKSHOP NLP POS