Responsible natural language processing: A principlist framework for social benefits

被引:8
作者
Behera, Rajat Kumar [1 ]
Bala, Pradip Kumar [2 ]
Rana, Nripendra P. [3 ]
Irani, Zahir [4 ]
机构
[1] Kalinga Inst Ind Technol KIIT Deemed be Univ, Sch Comp Engn, KIIT Rd, Bhubaneswar 751024, Orissa, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Ranchi, Area Informat Syst & Business Analyt, Nayasarai Rd,Prabandhan Nagar, Ranchi 835303, Jharkhand, India
[3] Qatar Univ, Coll Business & Econ, POB 2713, Doha, Qatar
[4] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Richmond Rd, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Responsible NLP; Ethical work climate; Social benefits; Responsible decision making; Ethics; DECISION-MAKING; ETHICAL CLIMATE; POISONING ATTACKS; TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS; IMPACT; FAIR; ACCOUNTABILITY; TRANSPARENCY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122306
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Businesses harness the power of natural language processing (NLP) to automate processes and make data-driven decisions. However, NLP raises concerns on a number of fronts due to its potential for disruption, which can be addressed with the assignment of responsibility. Therefore, responsible NLP (RNLP) can be designed as a principlist framework to ensure NLP systems are used in an ethical manner. The study proposes a principlist framework with the formulation of eight principlist ethical principles to ensure NLP is safe, secure and reliable for responsible decision making and subsequently results in social benefits. Using snowball sampling, data are collected from 15 informants, who represent senior-level positions in diversified industries. The analysis is performed with qualitative research methodology. The result produces two ethical practices. First is the adoption of RNLP as a disruptive technology for ethical decision making for social benefits and second is the creation of a culture of responsibility.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 169 条
[1]   Control Focus in Standard Forms: An Assessment through Text Mining and NLP [J].
Agrawal, Ajay Kumar ;
Jagannathan, Murali ;
Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 13 (01)
[2]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[3]   An ethical framework for evaluation of public health plans: a systematic process for legitimate and fair decision-making [J].
Akrami, F. ;
Zali, A. ;
Abbasi, M. ;
Majdzadeh, R. ;
Karimi, A. ;
Fadavi, M. ;
Bahar, A. Mehrabi .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 164 :30-38
[4]   AI anthropomorphism and its effect on users' self-congruence and self-AI integration: A theoretical framework and research agenda [J].
Alabed, Amani ;
Javornik, Ana ;
Gregory-Smith, Diana .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 182
[5]   An NLP-Powered Human Rights Monitoring Platform [J].
Alhelbawy, Ayman ;
Lattimer, Mark ;
Kruschwitz, Udo ;
Fox, Chris ;
Poesio, Massimo .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 153
[6]   Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary [J].
Allhoff, Fritz ;
Lin, Patrick ;
Steinberg, Jesse .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2011, 17 (02) :201-212
[7]   Untimely publications: Delayed Canadian fisheries science advice limits transparency of decision-making [J].
Archibald, D. W. ;
McIver, R. ;
Rangeley, R. .
MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132
[8]   Effects of security and privacy concerns on educational use of cloud services [J].
Arpaci, Ibrahim ;
Kilicer, Kerem ;
Bardakci, Salih .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 45 :93-98
[9]   Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies [J].
Ashok, Mona ;
Madan, Rohit ;
Joha, Anton ;
Sivarajah, Uthayasankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 62
[10]  
Balfe M., 2021, ETHICSMEDPUBLIC HLTH, V19