Spatially adaptive calibrations of airbox PM2.5 data

被引:2
作者
Tzeng, ShengLi [1 ]
Lai, Chi-Wei [2 ]
Huang, Hsin-Cheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Appl Math, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Inst Stat, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[3] Acad Sinica, Inst Stat Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
heterogeneous variance; I-spline; kriging; measurement-error model; microsensor; misaligned; monitoring station; robust estimation; spatially varying coefficient model;
D O I
10.1111/biom.13819
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Taiwan air quality monitoring network (TAQMN) and the AirBox network both monitor PM2.5 in Taiwan. The TAQMN, managed by Taiwan's Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), provides high-quality PM2.5 measurements at 77 monitoring stations. The AirBox network launched more recently consists of low-cost, small internet-of-things (IoT) microsensors (i.e., AirBoxes) at thousands of locations. While the AirBox network provides broad spatial coverage, its measurements are unreliable and require calibrations. However, applying a universal calibration procedure to all AirBoxes does not work well because the calibration line varies with local factors, including the chemical compositions of PM2.5, which are not homogeneous in space. Therefore, different calibrations are needed at different locations to adapt to their local environments. Unfortunately, AirBoxes and EPA locations are misaligned, challenging the calibration task. In this paper, we propose a spatial model with spatially varying coefficients to account for the heterogeneity in the data. Our method gives spatially adaptive calibrations of AirBoxes and produces accurate PM2.5 concentration estimates with their error bars at any location, incorporating two types of measurements. In addition, the proposed method is robust to outliers, requires no colocated data, and provides calibration formulas for new AirBoxes once they are added to the network. We illustrate our approach using hourly PM2.5 data in 2020. After the calibration, the results show that the PM2.5 prediction improves by about 38%-68% in root-mean-squared prediction error. Once the calibration formulas are established, we can obtain reliable PM2.5 values even if we ignore EPA data.
引用
收藏
页码:3637 / 3649
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale [J].
Bi, Jianzhao ;
Wildani, Avani ;
Chang, Howard H. ;
Liu, Yang .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (04) :2152-2162
[2]   BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators [J].
Billor, N ;
Hadi, AS ;
Velleman, PF .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2000, 34 (03) :279-298
[3]  
Carroll R. J., 2006, Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420010138
[4]   Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitoring network in Baltimore [J].
Datta, Abhirup ;
Saha, Arkajyoti ;
Zamora, Misti Levy ;
Buehler, Colby ;
Hao, Lei ;
Xiong, Fulizi ;
Gentner, Drew R. ;
Koehler, Kirsten .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 242
[5]   A joint Bayesian space-time model to integrate spatially misaligned air pollution data in R-INLA [J].
Forlani, C. ;
Bhatt, S. ;
Cameletti, M. ;
Krainski, E. ;
Blangiardo, M. .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2020, 31 (08)
[6]   Measurement error caused by spatial misalignment in environmental epidemiology [J].
Gryparis, Alexandros ;
Paciorek, Christopher J. ;
Zeka, Ariana ;
Schwartz, Joel ;
Coull, Brent A. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2009, 10 (02) :258-274
[7]  
Heffernan C., 2022, GAUSSIAN PROCESS FIL
[8]   Real-time PM2.5 mapping and anomaly detection from AirBoxes in Taiwan [J].
Huang, G. ;
Chen, L. -J. ;
Hwang, W. -H. ;
Tzeng, S. ;
Huang, H. -C. .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2018, 29 (08)
[9]  
Huber Peter J., 2009, Robust statistics. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Vsecond
[10]   Estimated generalized least squares in spatially misaligned regression models with Berkson error [J].
Lopiano, Kenneth K. ;
Young, Linda J. ;
Gotway, Carol A. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2013, 14 (04) :737-751