METHODS OF NEUROSCIENCE IN STUDYING WORLD POLITICS

被引:1
作者
Lebedeva, M. M. [1 ]
Zinovieva, E. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MGIMO Univ, World Polit Dept, Moscow, Russia
[2] MGIMO Univ, Ctr Int Informat Secur Sci & Technol Policy, Moscow, Russia
来源
POLIS-POLITICHESKIYE ISSLEDOVANIYA | 2023年 / 05期
关键词
neuroscience; objective research methods; international negotiations; international relations and world politics; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL-NEUROSCIENCE; INSIGHTS; FUTURE; CORTEX; STATES;
D O I
10.17976/jpps/2023.05.09
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Neuroscience is actively developing and penetrating into social areas of scientific research. Compared to other areas of the social sciences, international relations and world politics have been less concerned with neurostudies, since the conduct of experiment, which is the main method of neuroscience, is limited. The research question of the article is the following: how does neuroscience open up new opportunities for the study of world politics and, in particular, international negotiations? Neuroscience is aimed at obtaining objective data. In the history of international research, there were periods of increased interest in objective research methods. The last period is associated with the fourth industrial revolution and the emergence, among other things, of neuroscience. The article highlights four areas of neuroscience in the field of international relations and world politics: 1) The role of cognitive and emotional processes, the problem of leadership, cooperation and conflict in international relations and world politics in decision-making and interaction; 2) Differences in the course of neuroprocesses among representatives of different cultures; 3) The possibility of transferring data obtained by neuroscience to international relations and world politics; 4) Limitations and emerging benefits of using neuroscience in international research.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 152
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] GLOBAL LANDSCAPE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND PLACE OF RUSSIA
    Dezhina, Irina G.
    Nafikova, Tamam N.
    [J]. MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2020, 64 (09): : 37 - 47
  • [12] Emotion and Strategic Learning in War
    Dolan, Thomas M.
    [J]. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS, 2016, 12 (04) : 571 - 590
  • [14] Fisher Roger., 2011, GETTING YES NEGOTIAT
  • [15] Franks DD, 2010, NEUROSOCIOLOGY: THE NEXUS BETWEEN NEUROSCIENCE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5531-9
  • [16] Franks DD., 2013, HDB NEUROSOCIOLOGY, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8]
  • [17] Affective neuroscience, emotional regulation, and international relations
    Gammon, Earl
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL THEORY, 2020, 12 (02) : 189 - 219
  • [18] Glimcher PW, 2009, NEUROECONOMICS: DECISION MAKING AND THE BRAIN, P1
  • [19] [Глозман Жанна Марковна Glozman J.M.], 2013, [Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya], P121
  • [20] Holmes M., 2018, Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Social Neuroscience and International Relations, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108264761