Prediction of acute rejection in renal allografts using shear-wave dispersion slope

被引:0
作者
Kim, Taek Min [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Hyungwoo [2 ,3 ]
Cho, Jeong Yeon [1 ,2 ]
Han, Ahram [4 ]
Min, Sang-Il [4 ]
Ha, Jongwon [4 ]
Kim, Sang Youn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Graft rejection; Sonoelastography; Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging; Viscosity; FORCE IMPULSE QUANTIFICATION; ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; LIVER ELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE ELASTICITY; CLINICAL-USE; FIBROSIS; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10492-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the role of shear-wave dispersion slope for predicting renal allograft dysfunction. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 128 kidney transplant recipients (median age, 55 years [interquartile range, 43-62 years]; male, 68) who underwent biopsy for allograft evaluation from November 2022 to February 2023. Cortex and renal sinus fat stiffness and shear-wave dispersion slope were obtained at shear-wave elastography (SWE). Cortex-to-sinus stiffness ratio (SR) and dispersion slope ratio (DSR)-related clinical and pathologic factors were evaluated using multivariable linear regression analysis. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses for multiparametric ultrasound (US) parameters for identifying acute rejection and calculated the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values. Results Of 128 patients, 31 (24.2%) demonstrated acute rejection. The SR value did not differ between patient groups (1.21 vs. 1.20, p = 0.47). Patients with acute rejection demonstrated a higher DSR than those without rejection (1.4 vs. 1.21, p < 0.01). Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy grade (IFTA; coefficient, 0.11/grade; p = 0.04) and renal transplant and biopsy interval (coefficient, 0.00007/day; p = 0.03) were SR determinant factors, whereas only IFTA grade (coefficient, 0.10/grade; p = 0.01) for DSR. Multivariate analysis revealed mean resistive index (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.14, p = 0.01) and DSR value (OR 16.0, 95% CI 3.0-85.8, p = 0.001) as independent factors for predicting acute rejection. An AUC of 0.74 for detecting acute rejection was achieved by combining the resistive index and DSR value. Conclusion Shear-wave dispersion slope obtained at SWE may help identify renal allograft dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:4527 / 4537
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Review. The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand?
    Tublin, ME
    Bude, RO
    Platt, JF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (04) : 885 - 892
  • [32] Assessment of renal tissue elasticity by acoustic radiation force impulse quantification with histopathological correlation: preliminary experience in chronic kidney disease
    Wang, Liang
    Xia, Peng
    Lv, Ke
    Han, Jie
    Dai, Qing
    Li, Xue-mei
    Chen, Li-meng
    Jiang, Yu-xin
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (07) : 1694 - 1699
  • [33] Usefulness of Multiparametric Ultrasound for Evaluating Structural Abnormality of Transplanted Kidney: Can We Predict Histologic Abnormality on Renal Biopsy in Advance?
    Yoo, Moon Gyu
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Oh, Young Taik
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Han, Kyunghwa
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (03) : W139 - W144
  • [34] Zhao X, 2014, P ASME 2013 INT MECH, V3B, DOI [10.1115/IMECE2013-66109, DOI 10.1115/IMECE2013-66109]