Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information

被引:3
作者
Zhao, Xuejun [1 ]
Li, Hao [1 ]
Zhang, Keqiong [1 ]
Huang, Sheng-You [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Phys, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ACCURATE DOCKING; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; GLIDE; LEAD; OPTIMIZATION; RECOGNITION; NNSCORE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Nevertheless, knowledge-based scoring functions face a challenge in utilizing the experimental affinity data and thus may not perform well in binding affinity prediction. Addressing the challenge, we have proposed an improved version of the iterative knowledge-based scoring function ITScore by considering binding affinity information, which is referred to as ITScoreAff, based on a large training set of 6216 protein-ligand complexes with both structures and affinity data. ITScoreAff was extensively evaluated and compared with ITScore, 33 traditional, and 6 machine learning scoring functions in terms of docking power, ranking power, and screening power on the independent CASF-2016 benchmark. It was shown that ITScoreAff obtained an overall better performance than the other 40 scoring functions and gave an average success rate of 85.3% in docking power, a correlation coefficient of 0.723 in scoring power, and an average rank correlation coefficient of 0.668 in ranking power. In addition, ITScoreAff also achieved the overall best screening power when the top 10% of the ranked database were considered. These results demonstrated the robustness of ITScoreAff and its improvement over existing scoring functions.
引用
收藏
页码:9021 / 9034
页数:14
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein-Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity?
    Ballester, Pedro J.
    Schreyer, Adrian
    Blundell, Tom L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2014, 54 (03) : 944 - 955
  • [2] A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking
    Ballester, Pedro J.
    Mitchell, John B. O.
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (09) : 1169 - 1175
  • [3] Development of a New Scoring Function for Virtual Screening: APBScore
    Bao, Jingxiao
    He, Xiao
    Zhang, John Z. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2020, 60 (12) : 6355 - 6365
  • [4] Baxter CA, 1998, PROTEINS, V33, P367, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<367::AID-PROT6>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-W
  • [6] The Protein Data Bank
    Berman, HM
    Westbrook, J
    Feng, Z
    Gilliland, G
    Bhat, TN
    Weissig, H
    Shindyalov, IN
    Bourne, PE
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) : 235 - 242
  • [7] AROMATIC-AROMATIC INTERACTION - A MECHANISM OF PROTEIN-STRUCTURE STABILIZATION
    BURLEY, SK
    PETSKO, GA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1985, 229 (4708) : 23 - 28
  • [8] DLIGAND2: an improved knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand interactions using the distance-scaled, finite, ideal-gas reference state
    Chen, Pin
    Ke, Yaobin
    Lu, Yutong
    Du, Yunfei
    Li, Jiahui
    Yan, Hui
    Zhao, Huiying
    Zhou, Yaoqi
    Yang, Yuedong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [9] Efficient calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using GFN methods: the power of the cluster model
    Chen, Yuan-qiang
    Sheng, Yan-jing
    Ma, Yu-qiang
    Ding, Hong-ming
    [J]. PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 24 (23) : 14339 - 14347
  • [10] VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL-PURPOSE TRIPOS 5.2 FORCE-FIELD
    CLARK, M
    CRAMER, RD
    VANOPDENBOSCH, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1989, 10 (08) : 982 - 1012