Uncertainty quantification for nonlinear solid mechanics using reduced order models with Gaussian process regression

被引:11
作者
Cicci, Ludovica [1 ,2 ]
Fresca, Stefania [1 ]
Guo, Mengwu [3 ]
Manzoni, Andrea [1 ]
Zunino, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Matemat, MOX, Milan, Italy
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Twente, Dept Appl Math, Twente, Netherlands
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Reduced order modeling; Gaussian process regression; Nonlinear solid mechanics; Sensitivity analysis; Parameter estimation; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; REDUCTION; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.camwa.2023.08.016
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks, such as sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation, entail a huge computational complexity when dealing with input-output maps involving the solution of nonlinear differential problems, because of the need to query expensive numerical solvers repeatedly. Projection-based reduced order models (ROMs), such as the Galerkin-reduced basis (RB) method, have been extensively developed in the last decades to overcome the computational complexity of high fidelity full order models (FOMs), providing remarkable speed-ups when addressing UQ tasks related with parameterized differential problems. Nonetheless, constructing a projection-based ROM that can be efficiently queried usually requires extensive modifications to the original code, a task which is non-trivial for nonlinear problems, or even not possible at all when proprietary software is used. Non-intrusive ROMs - which rely on the FOM as a black box - have been recently developed to overcome this issue. In this work, we consider ROMs exploiting proper orthogonal decomposition to construct a reduced basis from a set of FOM snapshots, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) to approximate the RB projection coefficients. Two different approaches, namely a global GPR and a tensor-decomposition-based GPR, are explored on a set of 3D time-dependent solid mechanics examples. Finally, the non-intrusive ROM is exploited to perform global sensitivity analysis (relying on both screening and variance-based methods) and parameter estimation (through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods), showing remarkable computational speed-ups and very good accuracy compared to high-fidelity FOMs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Data-driven surrogates for high dimensional models using Gaussian process regression on the Grassmann manifold [J].
Giovanis, D. G. ;
Shields, M. D. .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 370 (370)
[32]   Gaussian process regression plus deep neural network autoencoder for probabilistic surrogate modeling in nonlinear mechanics of solids [J].
Deshpande, Saurabh ;
Rappel, Hussein ;
Hobbs, Mark ;
Bordas, Stephane P. A. ;
Lengiewicz, Jakub .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 437
[33]   Data-driven method for real-time prediction and uncertainty quantification of fatigue failure under stochastic loading using artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression [J].
Farid, Maor .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2022, 155
[34]   Data-driven reduced order modeling for parametric PDE eigenvalue problems using Gaussian process regression [J].
Bertrand, Fleurianne ;
Boffi, Daniele ;
Halim, Abdul .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2023, 495
[35]   Capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries with uncertainty quantification based on temporal convolutional network and Gaussian process regression [J].
Zhang, Ran ;
Ji, Chunhui ;
Zhou, Xing ;
Liu, Tianyu ;
Jin, Guang ;
Pan, Zhengqiang ;
Liu, Yajie .
ENERGY, 2024, 297
[36]   Bayesian proper orthogonal decomposition for learnable reduced-order models with uncertainty quantification [J].
Boluki S. ;
Dadaneh S.Z. ;
Dougherty E.R. ;
Qian X. .
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 5 (03) :1162-1173
[37]   Numerical continuation in nonlinear experiments using local Gaussian process regression [J].
L. Renson ;
J. Sieber ;
D. A. W. Barton ;
A. D. Shaw ;
S. A. Neild .
Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 98 :2811-2826
[38]   Numerical continuation in nonlinear experiments using local Gaussian process regression [J].
Renson, L. ;
Sieber, J. ;
Barton, D. A. W. ;
Shaw, A. D. ;
Neild, S. A. .
NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2019, 98 (04) :2811-2826
[39]   A clustering adaptive Gaussian process regression method: Response patterns based real-time prediction for nonlinear solid mechanics problems [J].
Li, Ming-Jian ;
Lian, Yanping ;
Cheng, Zhanshan ;
Li, Lehui ;
Wang, Zhidong ;
Gao, Ruxin ;
Fang, Daining .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 436
[40]   Damage quantification using transfer component analysis combined with Gaussian process regression [J].
Yano, Marcus Omori ;
da Silva, Samuel ;
Figueiredo, Eloi ;
Giacon Villani, Luis G. .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023, 22 (02) :1290-1307