Uncertainty quantification for nonlinear solid mechanics using reduced order models with Gaussian process regression

被引:12
作者
Cicci, Ludovica [1 ,2 ]
Fresca, Stefania [1 ]
Guo, Mengwu [3 ]
Manzoni, Andrea [1 ]
Zunino, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Matemat, MOX, Milan, Italy
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Twente, Dept Appl Math, Twente, Netherlands
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Reduced order modeling; Gaussian process regression; Nonlinear solid mechanics; Sensitivity analysis; Parameter estimation; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; REDUCTION; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.camwa.2023.08.016
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks, such as sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation, entail a huge computational complexity when dealing with input-output maps involving the solution of nonlinear differential problems, because of the need to query expensive numerical solvers repeatedly. Projection-based reduced order models (ROMs), such as the Galerkin-reduced basis (RB) method, have been extensively developed in the last decades to overcome the computational complexity of high fidelity full order models (FOMs), providing remarkable speed-ups when addressing UQ tasks related with parameterized differential problems. Nonetheless, constructing a projection-based ROM that can be efficiently queried usually requires extensive modifications to the original code, a task which is non-trivial for nonlinear problems, or even not possible at all when proprietary software is used. Non-intrusive ROMs - which rely on the FOM as a black box - have been recently developed to overcome this issue. In this work, we consider ROMs exploiting proper orthogonal decomposition to construct a reduced basis from a set of FOM snapshots, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) to approximate the RB projection coefficients. Two different approaches, namely a global GPR and a tensor-decomposition-based GPR, are explored on a set of 3D time-dependent solid mechanics examples. Finally, the non-intrusive ROM is exploited to perform global sensitivity analysis (relying on both screening and variance-based methods) and parameter estimation (through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods), showing remarkable computational speed-ups and very good accuracy compared to high-fidelity FOMs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Latent-space time evolution of non-intrusive reduced-order models using Gaussian process emulation [J].
Maulik, Romit ;
Botsas, Themistoklis ;
Ramachandra, Nesar ;
Mason, Lachlan R. ;
Pan, Indranil .
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2021, 416
[22]   Structural uncertainty modeling for nonlinear geometric response using nonintrusive reduced order models [J].
Wang, X. Q. ;
Mignolet, Marc P. ;
Soize, Christian .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2020, 60
[23]   Multiaxial fatigue prediction and uncertainty quantification based on back propagation neural network and Gaussian process regression [J].
Gao, Jingjing ;
Wang, Jun ;
Xu, Zili ;
Wang, Cunjun ;
Yan, Song .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2023, 168
[24]   A Hybrid Polynomial Chaos Expansion and Gaussian Process Regression Method for Forward Uncertainty Quantification of Integrated Circuits [J].
Manfredi, Paolo ;
Trinchero, Riccardo .
2024 IEEE 33RD CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING AND SYSTEMS, EPEPS 2024, 2024,
[25]   Uncertainty quantification of bladed disc systems using data driven stochastic reduced order models [J].
Kumar, Rahul ;
Ali, Shaikh Faruque ;
Jeyaraman, Sankarkumar ;
Gupta, Sayan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 190
[26]   Improved profile fitting and quantification of uncertainty in experimental measurements of impurity transport coefficients using Gaussian process regression [J].
Chilenski, M. A. ;
Greenwald, M. ;
Marzouk, Y. ;
Howard, N. T. ;
White, A. E. ;
Rice, J. E. ;
Walk, J. R. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2015, 55 (02)
[27]   Uncertainty Quantification in Predicting UCS Using Fully Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression with Consideration of Model Class Selection [J].
Song, Chao ;
Zhao, Tengyuan .
GEO-RISK 2023: INNOVATION IN DATA AND ANALYSIS METHODS, 2023, 345 :9-19
[28]   Delamination area quantification in composite structures using Gaussian process regression and auto-regressive models [J].
Paixao, Jesse ;
da Silva, Samuel ;
Figueiredo, Eloi ;
Radu, Lucian ;
Park, Gyuhae .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2021, 27 (23-24) :2778-2792
[29]   A hybrid data-driven-physics-constrained Gaussian process regression framework with deep kernel for uncertainty quantification [J].
Chang, Cheng ;
Zeng, Tieyong .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2023, 486
[30]   Epistemic Uncertainty-Aware Barlow Twins Reduced Order Modeling for Nonlinear Contact Problems [J].
Kadeethum, Teeratorn ;
Jakeman, John D. ;
Choi, Youngsoo ;
Bouklas, Nikolaos ;
Yoon, Hongkyu .
IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 :62970-62985