CO2 Capture in a Thermal Power Plant Using Sugarcane Residual Biomass

被引:1
|
作者
Restrepo-Valencia, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Walter, Arnaldo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Energy, Rua Mendeleyev 200, BR-13083860 Campinas, Brazil
[2] Univ Autonoma Manizales, Dept Mecan & Prod, Grp Diseno Mecan & Desarrollo Ind, Antigua Estn Ferrocarril, Manizales 170001, Colombia
关键词
BECCS; bioelectricity; carbon capture and storage; carbon sequestration; climate change; negative emissions; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; CARBON CAPTURE; CYCLE SYSTEMS; NATURAL-GAS; ETHANOL; BRAZIL; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; BAGASSE;
D O I
10.3390/en16124570
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The decarbonization of energy matrices is crucial to limit global warming below 2 & DEG;C this century. An alternative capable of enabling zero or even negative CO2 emissions is bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). In this sense, the Brazilian sugar-energy sector draws attention, as it would be possible to combine the production of fuel and electricity from renewable biomass. This paper is the final part of a study that aimed to research carbon capture and storage (CCS) in energy systems based on sugarcane. The case studied is CCS in thermal power plants considering two different technologies: the steam cycle based on the condensing-extraction steam turbine (CEST) and the combined cycle integrated to biomass gasification (BIG-CC). The results for the thermal power plant indicate that the CO2 capture costs may be lower than those in cogeneration systems, which were previously studied. The main reasons are the potential scale effects and the minimization of energy penalties associated with integrating the CCS system into the mills. In the best cases, capture costs can be reduced to EUR 54-65 per ton of CO2 for the CEST technology and EUR 57-68 per ton of CO2 for the BIG-CC technology.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integration of the steam cycle and CO2 capture process in a decarbonization power plant
    Xu, Gang
    Hu, Yue
    Tang, Baoqiang
    Yang, Yongping
    Zhang, Kai
    Liu, Wenyi
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 73 (01) : 277 - 286
  • [42] Economic evaluation of A-USC power plant with CO2 capture unit
    Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice
    44-100, Poland
    J. Power Technol., 2015 (75-83):
  • [43] Optimum Particle Size of Treated Calcites for CO2 Capture in a Power Plant
    Quesada Carballo, Luis
    Perez Perez, Maria del Rosario
    Cantador Fernandez, David
    Caballero Amores, Alvaro
    Fernandez Rodriguez, Jose Maria
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (08)
  • [44] Combining bioenergy and CO2 capture from gas fired power plant
    Mathisen, Anette
    Hegerland, Georg
    Eldrup, Nils Henrik
    Skagestad, Ragnhild
    Haugen, Hans Aksel
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2918 - 2925
  • [45] Natural gas fired combined cycle power plant with CO2 capture
    Shao, Yulin, 1600, Pergamon Press Inc, Tarrytown, NY, United States (36):
  • [46] Economic evaluation of A-USC power plant with CO2 capture unit
    Stepczynska-Drygas, Katarzyna
    Dykas, Slawomir
    Lukowicz, Henryk
    Czaja, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 95 (05): : 75 - 83
  • [47] A further step towards a Graz Cycle power plant for CO2 capture
    Sanz, W.
    Jericha, H.
    Luckel, F.
    Goettlich, E.
    Heitmeir, F.
    Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005, Vol 5, 2005, : 181 - +
  • [48] Integration of power plant and amine scrubbing to reduce CO2 capture costs
    Romeo, Luis M.
    Bolea, Irene
    Escosa, Jesus M.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 28 (8-9) : 1039 - 1046
  • [49] Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle
    Le Moullec, Yann
    ENERGY, 2013, 49 : 32 - 46
  • [50] Using CO2 to enhance carbon capture and biomass applications of freshwater macroalgae
    Cole, Andrew J.
    Mata, Leonardo
    Paul, Nicholas A.
    de Nys, Rocky
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2014, 6 (06): : 637 - 645