The Paradoxes of Trust and Transparency of Blockchain Technologies

被引:7
作者
Baudet, Cedric [1 ]
Medina, Maximiliano Jeanneret [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Arc Sch Management Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Acceptance; Action Research; Blockchain; E-Government; Extreme Management Situation; KSI; Transparency; Trust; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; BENEFITS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.4018/JGIM.321111
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The Republic and Canton of Jura has decided to adopt and integrate the CERTUS digital seal and the KSI blockchain as the central technological components of their e-government portal and of their digital government transformation program. However, this project is taking place in turbulent times. While blockchain suffers from a bad reputation for ecological reasons and while the Swiss Confederation has rejected the selected blockchain solution, this article seeks to answer how to grasp the paradoxes of blockchain technologies acceptance by state citizens in an extreme management situation. Through an action research that aims to solve practical problems and create scientific knowledge, this study highlights the paradox of trust and considers blockchain technologies to enhance trust between citizens in politically stable countries. Furthermore, it investigates the paradox of transparency of blockchain technologies in an extreme management situation and proposes communicating in two levels of abstraction to limit tensions in turbulent times.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   EXPERTISE, TRUST AND TRANSPARENCY IN VACCINE POLICY [J].
Nowak, Piotr Grzegorz .
DIAMETROS, 2025, 22 (82) :2-6
[42]   Linking Transparency to Trust in Government and Voice [J].
Porumbescu, Gregory .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 47 (05) :520-537
[43]   In Blockchain We Trust: Does Blockchain Itself Generate Trust? [J].
Shin, Donghee ;
Bianco, William T. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2020, 101 (07) :2522-2538
[44]   In blockchain we trust: Ideologies and discourses sustaining trust in bitcoin [J].
Pecis, Lara ;
Cervi, Lucia ;
Introna, Lucas .
INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION, 2025, 35 (02)
[45]   Enhancing Transparency and Trust in Agrifood Supply Chains through Novel Blockchain-based Architecture [J].
Sakthivel, V ;
Prakash, P. ;
Lee, Jae-Woo ;
Prabu, P. .
KSII TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 18 (07) :1968-1985
[46]   Dis/Trust and data-driven technologies [J].
Duenas-Cid, David ;
Calzati, Stefano .
INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2023, 12 (04)
[47]   ON THE SELECTION OF SUITABLE BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT [J].
Milicevic, Vladimir ;
Zdravkovic, Nemanja ;
Jovic, Jovana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (03) :651-664
[48]   NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR RESTORING TRUST IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Romanelli, Mauro .
STRATEGICA: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS IN THE CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, 2016, :1088-1097
[49]   The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat traceability and transparency [J].
Sander, Fabian ;
Semeijn, Janjaap ;
Mahr, Dominik .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2018, 120 (09) :2066-2079
[50]   Trust and Transparency in Artificial IntelligenceTrust and Transparency in Artificial IntelligenceT. Mitchell [J].
Thomas Mitchell .
Philosophy & Technology, 2025, 38 (3)