The Paradoxes of Trust and Transparency of Blockchain Technologies

被引:7
作者
Baudet, Cedric [1 ]
Medina, Maximiliano Jeanneret [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Arc Sch Management Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Acceptance; Action Research; Blockchain; E-Government; Extreme Management Situation; KSI; Transparency; Trust; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; BENEFITS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.4018/JGIM.321111
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The Republic and Canton of Jura has decided to adopt and integrate the CERTUS digital seal and the KSI blockchain as the central technological components of their e-government portal and of their digital government transformation program. However, this project is taking place in turbulent times. While blockchain suffers from a bad reputation for ecological reasons and while the Swiss Confederation has rejected the selected blockchain solution, this article seeks to answer how to grasp the paradoxes of blockchain technologies acceptance by state citizens in an extreme management situation. Through an action research that aims to solve practical problems and create scientific knowledge, this study highlights the paradox of trust and considers blockchain technologies to enhance trust between citizens in politically stable countries. Furthermore, it investigates the paradox of transparency of blockchain technologies in an extreme management situation and proposes communicating in two levels of abstraction to limit tensions in turbulent times.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Understanding the Formation of Trust in Blockchain [J].
Ali, Vizaad ;
Norman, Azah Anir ;
Bin Azzuhri, Saaidal Razalli .
2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING (ICOCO), 2021, :25-30
[32]   Designing for Trust in Blockchain Platforms [J].
Zavolokina, Liudmila ;
Zani, Noah ;
Schwabe, Gerhard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 70 (03) :849-863
[33]   Trust Evolution Game in Blockchain [J].
Al Breiki, Hamda .
2022 IEEE/ACS 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA), 2022,
[34]   Blockchain Applications and Institutional Trust [J].
Smits, Martin ;
Hulstijn, Joris .
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN, 2020, 3
[35]   Managing Citizens' Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust [J].
Venkatesh, Viswanath ;
Thong, James Y. L. ;
Chan, Frank K. Y. ;
Hu, Paul J. H. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (01) :87-111
[36]   Trust, Integrity and the Weaponising of Information: the EU's Transparency Paradox [J].
Field, Mark ;
Roberts, Sue .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (03) :276-292
[37]   Understanding Managers' Reactions to Blockchain Technologies in the Supply Chain: The Reliable and Unbiased Software Agent [J].
Falcone, Ellie C. ;
Steelman, Zachary R. ;
Aloysius, John A. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2021, 42 (01) :25-45
[38]   EXPERTISE, TRUST AND TRANSPARENCY IN VACCINE POLICY [J].
Nowak, Piotr Grzegorz .
DIAMETROS, 2025, 22 (82) :2-6
[39]   In Blockchain We Trust: Does Blockchain Itself Generate Trust? [J].
Shin, Donghee ;
Bianco, William T. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2020, 101 (07) :2522-2538
[40]   Transparency policy and students' satisfaction and trust [J].
Medina, Cayetano ;
Rufin, Ramon .
TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2015, 9 (03) :309-323