Is preoperative hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia a reliable marker for anastomotic leakage risk in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program?

被引:1
作者
Choi, Joseph Do Woong [1 ,2 ]
Kwik, Charlotte [1 ]
Vivekanandamoorthy, Nurojan [1 ]
Shanmugalingam, Aswin [1 ]
Allan, Lachlan [1 ]
Gavegan, Fiona [1 ]
Shedden, Karen [1 ]
Peters, Ashleigh [1 ]
Khoury, Toufic El [1 ,3 ]
Pathmanathan, Nimalan [1 ,2 ]
Toh, James Wei Tatt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Corner Hawkesbury Rd & Darcy Rd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Anastomotic leak; Hypoalbuminemia; Hypoproteinemia; Immunonutrition; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; SERUM-ALBUMIN; RESECTION; CANCER; IMMUNONUTRITION; METAANALYSIS; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04450-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposePreoperative hypoalbuminemia has traditionally been used as a marker of nutritional status and is considered a significant risk factor for anastomotic leak (AL).MethodsThe Westmead Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (WERAS) prospectively collected database, consisting of 361 patients who underwent colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis, was interrogated. Preoperative serum albumin and protein levels (measured within 1 week of surgery) were plotted on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) and statistically analyzed for cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV).ResultsThe incidence of AL was 4.4% (16/361). Overall mortality was 1.4% (5/361), 6.3% (1/16) in the AL group, and 1.2% (4/345) in the no AL group. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the AL group were 39 g/L and 75 g/L, respectively. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the no AL group were 38 g/L and 74 g/L, respectively. The Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference in albumin levels (p = 0.4457) nor protein levels (p = 0.6245) in the AL and no AL groups. ROC curves demonstrated that preoperative albumin and protein levels were not good predictors of anastomotic leak. Cutoff values for albumin (38 g/L) and protein (75 g/L) both had poor PPV for AL (4.8% and 3.8% respectively).ConclusionIn patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery as part of an ERAS program, preoperative serum albumin and protein levels are not reliable in predicting AL. This may be because of nutritional supplementation provided as part of an ERAS program may correct nutritional deficits to protect against AL or that low albumin/protein is not as robust a marker of AL as previously reported.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomies
    Yilmaz, Gulseren
    Akca, Aysu
    Aydin, Nevin
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2018, 89 (07) : 351 - 356
  • [42] Clinical outcomes of the very elderly undergoing enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery
    Khan, M. A.
    Pandey, S.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2016, 98 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [43] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for colorectal cancer in Japan
    Shida, Dai
    Tagawa, Kyoko
    Inada, Kentaro
    Nasu, Keiichi
    Seyama, Yasuji
    Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi
    Miyamoto, Sachio
    Inoue, Satoru
    Umekita, Nobutaka
    BMC SURGERY, 2015, 15
  • [44] Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: A single center experience
    Bona, Stefano
    Molteni, Mattia
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Elmore, Ugo
    Bagnoli, Pietro
    Monzani, Roberta
    Caravaca, Monica
    Montorsi, Marco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (46) : 17578 - 17587
  • [45] The Impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol on Colorectal Surgery in a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital
    Lopes, Catarina
    Gomes, Mariana Vaz
    Rosete, Manuel
    Almeida, Ana
    Silva, Lusa Isabel
    Tralhao, Jose Guilherme
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2022, : 254 - 263
  • [46] Experience with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Bariatric Surgery: Comparison of MGB and LSG in 374 Patients
    Blanchet, Marie-Cecile
    Gignoux, Benoit
    Matussiere, Yann
    Vulliez, Alexandre
    Lanz, Thomas
    Monier, Fabienne
    Frering, Vincent
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (07) : 1896 - 1900
  • [47] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) in gynecologic oncology - Practical considerations for program development
    Nelson, G.
    Dowdy, S. C.
    Lasala, J.
    Mena, G.
    Bakkum-Gamez, J.
    Meyer, L. A.
    Iniesta, M. D.
    Ramirez, P. T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 147 (03) : 617 - 620
  • [48] Impact of enhanced recovery program on clinical outcomes after elective colorectal surgery in a rural hospital. A single center experience
    Pesce, Antonio
    Portinari, Mattia
    Fabbri, Nicolo
    Sciascia, Valeria
    Uccellatori, Lisa
    Vozza, Michela
    Righini, Erminio
    Feo, Carlo V.
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [49] Is the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Effective and Safe in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ni, Xiaofei
    Jia, Dan
    Chen, Yan
    Wang, Lei
    Suo, Jian
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (07) : 1502 - 1512
  • [50] Transition from hospital to home after elective colorectal surgery performed in an enhanced recovery program: An integrative review
    Ruel, Marie-Christine
    Ramirez Garcia, Maria-Pilar
    Arbour, Caroline
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (04): : 1550 - 1570