Is preoperative hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia a reliable marker for anastomotic leakage risk in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program?

被引:1
作者
Choi, Joseph Do Woong [1 ,2 ]
Kwik, Charlotte [1 ]
Vivekanandamoorthy, Nurojan [1 ]
Shanmugalingam, Aswin [1 ]
Allan, Lachlan [1 ]
Gavegan, Fiona [1 ]
Shedden, Karen [1 ]
Peters, Ashleigh [1 ]
Khoury, Toufic El [1 ,3 ]
Pathmanathan, Nimalan [1 ,2 ]
Toh, James Wei Tatt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Corner Hawkesbury Rd & Darcy Rd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Anastomotic leak; Hypoalbuminemia; Hypoproteinemia; Immunonutrition; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; SERUM-ALBUMIN; RESECTION; CANCER; IMMUNONUTRITION; METAANALYSIS; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04450-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposePreoperative hypoalbuminemia has traditionally been used as a marker of nutritional status and is considered a significant risk factor for anastomotic leak (AL).MethodsThe Westmead Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (WERAS) prospectively collected database, consisting of 361 patients who underwent colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis, was interrogated. Preoperative serum albumin and protein levels (measured within 1 week of surgery) were plotted on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) and statistically analyzed for cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV).ResultsThe incidence of AL was 4.4% (16/361). Overall mortality was 1.4% (5/361), 6.3% (1/16) in the AL group, and 1.2% (4/345) in the no AL group. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the AL group were 39 g/L and 75 g/L, respectively. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the no AL group were 38 g/L and 74 g/L, respectively. The Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference in albumin levels (p = 0.4457) nor protein levels (p = 0.6245) in the AL and no AL groups. ROC curves demonstrated that preoperative albumin and protein levels were not good predictors of anastomotic leak. Cutoff values for albumin (38 g/L) and protein (75 g/L) both had poor PPV for AL (4.8% and 3.8% respectively).ConclusionIn patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery as part of an ERAS program, preoperative serum albumin and protein levels are not reliable in predicting AL. This may be because of nutritional supplementation provided as part of an ERAS program may correct nutritional deficits to protect against AL or that low albumin/protein is not as robust a marker of AL as previously reported.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The economic burdens of anastomotic leakage for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in Japan
    Mukai, Toshiki
    Maki, Akihiro
    Shimizu, Hideharu
    Kim, Hyesung
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (10) : 4323 - 4329
  • [22] Laparoscopic colorectal surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program Experience with 200 cases from a single Italian center
    Pedrazzani, Corrado
    Conti, Cristian
    Mantovani, Guido
    Fernandes, Eduardo
    Turri, Giulia
    Lazzarini, Enrico
    Menestrina, Nicola
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (35)
  • [23] ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study
    Catarci, Marco
    Ruffo, Giacomo
    Viola, Massimo Giuseppe
    Pirozzi, Felice
    Delrio, Paolo
    Borghi, Felice
    Garulli, Gianluca
    Baldazzi, Gianandrea
    Marini, Pierluigi
    Sica, Giuseppe
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (06): : 3965 - 3984
  • [24] Protein intakes are associated with reduced length of stay: a comparison between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and conventional care after elective colorectal surgery
    Yeung, Sophia E.
    Hilkewich, Leslee
    Gillis, Chelsia
    Heine, John A.
    Fenton, Tanis R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 106 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [25] Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Across a Provincial Healthcare System: The ERAS Alberta Colorectal Surgery Experience
    Nelson, Gregg
    Kiyang, Lawrence N.
    Crumley, Ellen T.
    Chuck, Anderson
    Thanh Nguyen
    Faris, Peter
    Wasylak, Tracy
    Basualdo-Hammond, Carlota
    McKay, Susan
    Ljungqvist, Olle
    Gramlich, Leah M.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (05) : 1092 - 1103
  • [26] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Jiang, Wenbin
    Mao, Qijiang
    Xie, Yangyang
    Ying, Hanning
    Xu, Hongxia
    Ge, Huiqing
    Feng, Lijun
    Liu, Hui
    Li, Jianhua
    Liang, Xiao
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (08) : 4563 - 4572
  • [27] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lv, Liang
    Shao, Yong-fang
    Zhou, Yan-bing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (12) : 1549 - 1554
  • [28] Implementation of Enhanced Recovery (ERAS) in Colorectal Surgery Has a Positive Impact on Non-ERAS Liver Surgery Patients
    Labgaa, Ismail
    Jarrar, Ghada
    Joliat, Gaetan-Romain
    Allemann, Pierre
    Gander, Sylvain
    Blanc, Catherine
    Huebner, Martin
    Demartines, Nicolas
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (05) : 1082 - 1091
  • [29] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liang Lv
    Yong-fang Shao
    Yan-bing Zhou
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012, 27 : 1549 - 1554
  • [30] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?
    Bianchini, Chiara
    Pelucchi, Stefano
    Pastore, Antonio
    Feo, Carlo V.
    Ciorba, Andrea
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) : 439 - 443