Is preoperative hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia a reliable marker for anastomotic leakage risk in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program?

被引:1
作者
Choi, Joseph Do Woong [1 ,2 ]
Kwik, Charlotte [1 ]
Vivekanandamoorthy, Nurojan [1 ]
Shanmugalingam, Aswin [1 ]
Allan, Lachlan [1 ]
Gavegan, Fiona [1 ]
Shedden, Karen [1 ]
Peters, Ashleigh [1 ]
Khoury, Toufic El [1 ,3 ]
Pathmanathan, Nimalan [1 ,2 ]
Toh, James Wei Tatt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Corner Hawkesbury Rd & Darcy Rd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Anastomotic leak; Hypoalbuminemia; Hypoproteinemia; Immunonutrition; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; SERUM-ALBUMIN; RESECTION; CANCER; IMMUNONUTRITION; METAANALYSIS; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04450-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposePreoperative hypoalbuminemia has traditionally been used as a marker of nutritional status and is considered a significant risk factor for anastomotic leak (AL).MethodsThe Westmead Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (WERAS) prospectively collected database, consisting of 361 patients who underwent colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis, was interrogated. Preoperative serum albumin and protein levels (measured within 1 week of surgery) were plotted on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) and statistically analyzed for cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV).ResultsThe incidence of AL was 4.4% (16/361). Overall mortality was 1.4% (5/361), 6.3% (1/16) in the AL group, and 1.2% (4/345) in the no AL group. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the AL group were 39 g/L and 75 g/L, respectively. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the no AL group were 38 g/L and 74 g/L, respectively. The Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference in albumin levels (p = 0.4457) nor protein levels (p = 0.6245) in the AL and no AL groups. ROC curves demonstrated that preoperative albumin and protein levels were not good predictors of anastomotic leak. Cutoff values for albumin (38 g/L) and protein (75 g/L) both had poor PPV for AL (4.8% and 3.8% respectively).ConclusionIn patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery as part of an ERAS program, preoperative serum albumin and protein levels are not reliable in predicting AL. This may be because of nutritional supplementation provided as part of an ERAS program may correct nutritional deficits to protect against AL or that low albumin/protein is not as robust a marker of AL as previously reported.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is preoperative hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia a reliable marker for anastomotic leakage risk in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program?
    Joseph Do Woong Choi
    Charlotte Kwik
    Nurojan Vivekanandamoorthy
    Aswin Shanmugalingam
    Lachlan Allan
    Fiona Gavegan
    Karen Shedden
    Ashleigh Peters
    Toufic El Khoury
    Nimalan Pathmanathan
    James Wei Tatt Toh
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [2] Association of perioperative immunonutrition with anastomotic leak among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery within a robust enhanced recovery after surgery program
    Younan, Samuel A.
    Ali, Danish
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    Bradley III, Joel F. Bradley
    Hopkins, M. Benjamin
    Geiger, Timothy
    Jayaram, Jennifer
    Khan, Aimal
    SURGERY, 2025, 181
  • [3] Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia and Development of Surgical Site Infection and Anastomotic Leakage in Emergency Colorectal Surgery
    Pishgahi, Mohammad
    Nejatollahi, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    Ghorbani, Fariba
    Montazeri, Sadra
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 25 (09)
  • [4] Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guideline Adherence in Elective Colorectal Surgery
    Mehl, Lyons L.
    Waldron, R.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S206 - S206
  • [5] Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
    Park, In Ja
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 38 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [6] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Varadhan, Krishna K.
    Neal, Keith R.
    Dejong, Cornelius H. C.
    Fearon, Kenneth C. H.
    Ljungqvist, Olle
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2010, 29 (04) : 434 - 440
  • [7] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Improving Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Major Colorectal Surgery
    Turaga, Anjani H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [8] Neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS for geriatric patients undergoing elective craniotomy: A review
    Liu, Bolin
    Liu, Shujuan
    Zheng, Tao
    Lu, Dan
    Chen, Lei
    Ma, Tao
    Wang, Yuan
    Gao, Guodong
    He, Shiming
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (33) : E30043
  • [9] An evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Wenxian
    Wang, Fang
    Qi, Shujung
    Liu, Zhijun
    Zhao, Subin
    Zhang, Ning
    Ping, Fumin
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2023, 18 (04) : 565 - 577
  • [10] Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program
    Luis Munoz, Jose
    Oliva Alvarez, Maria
    Cuquerella, Vicent
    Miranda, Elena
    Pico, Carlos
    Flores, Raquel
    Resalt-Pereira, Marta
    Moya, Pedro
    Perez, Ana
    Arroyo, Antonio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (09): : 4003 - 4010