Sustained response of galcanezumab in migraine prevention: Patient--level data from a post hoc analysis in patients with episodic or chronic migraine

被引:0
作者
Tepper, Stewart J. [1 ]
Dong, Yan [2 ]
Vincent, Maurice [2 ,3 ]
Wietecha, Linda A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, OH USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Neurol Platform Med Launch, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2023年 / 63卷 / 10期
关键词
50% response; calcitonin gene-related peptide; galcanezumab; migraine; migraine headache days; prevention; PROPHYLACTIC MEDICATIONS; TREATMENT EXPECTATIONS; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEADACHE; ADHERENCE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1111/head.14494
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate, at population and individual patient levels, the sustained response of reduction in migraine headache days in patients with migraine treated with galcanezumab. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of double-blind galcanezumab studies in patients with migraine: two 6-month episodic migraine (EM; EVOLVE-1/EVOLVE-2), one 3-month chronic migraine (CM; REGAIN), and one 3-month treatment-resistant migraine (CONQUER). Patients received monthly subcutaneous galcanezumab 120 mg (after 240 mg initial loading dose), galcanezumab 240 mg, or placebo. In the EM and CM studies, the proportions of patients with >= 50% and >= 75% (EM only) reduction from baseline in average monthly migraine headache days from Months 1 to 3 and Months 4 to 6 were evaluated. A mean monthly response rate was estimated. The sustained effect was defined as maintaining >= 50% response for >= 3 consecutive months in the patient-level data for EM and CM. Results: A total of 3348 patients with EM or CM from the EVOLVE-1/EVOLVE-2 (placebo, n = 894, galcanezumab, n = 879), REGAIN (placebo, n = 558, galcanezumab, n = 555), and CONQUER (EM: placebo, n = 132, galcanezumab, n = 137; CM: placebo, n = 98, galcanezumab, n = 95) studies were included. Patients were predominantly female, White, and had monthly migraine headache day averages ranging from 9.1 to 9.5 days (EM) and 18.1 to 19.6 days (CM). In patients with EM and CM, 19.0% and 22.6% of galcanezumab-treated patients, respectively, had significantly higher maintenance of >= 50% response for all months in the double-blind period compared to 8.0% and 1.5% of placebo-treated patients. The odds ratios (OR) of achieving clinical response for EM and CM were double with galcanezumab (OR = 3.0 [95% CI 1.8, 4.8] and OR = 6.3 [95% CI 1.7, 22.7], respectively). At the individual patient level, of patients who had >= 75% response at Month 3 in the galcanezumab 120 and 240 mg dose groups and placebo group, 39.9% (55/138) and 43.0% (61/142), respectively, of galcanezumab-treated patients maintained >= 75% response during Months 4-6 compared to 32.7% (51/156) with placebo. Conclusion: More galcanezumab-treated patients achieved >= 50% response within the first 3 months of treatment compared to placebo; responses were sustained during Months 4-6. The odds of achieving >= 50% response were double with galcanezumab.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1390
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine [J].
Hepp, Zsolt ;
Dodick, David W. ;
Varon, Sepideh F. ;
Gillard, Patrick ;
Hansen, Ryan N. ;
Devine, Emily B. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2015, 35 (06) :478-488
[12]   Systematic Review of Migraine Prophylaxis Adherence and Persistence [J].
Hepp, Zsolt ;
Bloudek, Lisa M. ;
Varon, Sepideh F. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2014, 20 (01) :22-33
[13]   The broad treatment expectations of migraine patients [J].
Kelman L. .
The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2006, 7 (6) :403-406
[14]   Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment [J].
Laferton, Johannes A. C. ;
Kube, Tobias ;
Salzmann, Stefan ;
Auer, Charlotte J. ;
Shedden-Mora, Meike C. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[15]   Why headache treatment fails [J].
Lipton, RB ;
Silberstein, SD ;
Saper, JR ;
Bigal, ME ;
Goadsby, PJ .
NEUROLOGY, 2003, 60 (07) :1064-1070
[16]   Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial [J].
Mulleners, Wim M. ;
Kim, Byung-Kun ;
Lainez, Miguel J. A. ;
Lanteri-Minet, Michel ;
Pozo-Rosich, Patricia ;
Wang, Shufang ;
Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje ;
Aurora, Sheena K. ;
Nichols, Russell M. ;
Yunes-Medina, Laura ;
Detke, Holland C. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2020, 19 (10) :814-825
[17]   Analysis of Initial Nonresponders to Galcanezumab in Patients With Episodic or Chronic Migraine: Results From the EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies [J].
Nichols, Russell ;
Doty, Erin ;
Sacco, Sara ;
Ruff, Dustin ;
Pearlman, Eric ;
Aurora, Sheena K. .
HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (02) :192-204
[18]   Prognostic factors for chronic headache A systematic review [J].
Probyn, Katrin ;
Bowers, Hannah ;
Caldwell, Fiona ;
Mistry, Dipesh ;
Underwood, Martin ;
Matharu, Manjit ;
Pincus, Tamar .
NEUROLOGY, 2017, 89 (03) :291-301
[19]   100% Response Rate to Galcanezumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Results From Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 Studies [J].
Rosen, Noah ;
Pearlman, Eric ;
Ruff, Dustin ;
Day, Kathleen ;
Nagy, Abraham Jim .
HEADACHE, 2018, 58 (09) :1347-1357
[20]   The beneficial effect of positive treatment expectations on pharmacological migraine prophylaxis [J].
Schmidt, Katharina ;
Berding, Tobias ;
Kleine-Borgmann, Julian ;
Engler, Harald ;
Holle-Lee, Dagny ;
Gaul, Charly ;
Bingel, Ulrike .
PAIN, 2022, 163 (02) :E319-E327