Co-benefits of the National Key Ecological Function Areas in China for carbon sequestration and environmental quality

被引:6
|
作者
Chen, Hanyu [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Mengyang [1 ,2 ]
Xi, Zenglei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiao [3 ,4 ]
Yao, Shunbo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Sch Econ, Baoding, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ, Res Ctr Resources Utilizat & Environm Conservat, Baoding, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yangling, Peoples R China
[4] Northwest A&F Univ, Ctr Resource Econ & Environm Management, Yangling, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
National Key Ecological Function Areas; carbon sequestration; environmental quality; co-benefits; time-varying difference-in-differences; China; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1093135
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe National Key Ecological Functional Areas (NKEFAs) are location-oriented ecological engineering of China, which rely on the main functional area planning. The co-benefits of ecological product supply and ecological environment improvement of NKEFAs has not been fully assessed in the literature. MethodsNKEFAs is considered a quasi-natural experiment, and the time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) model is used to assess the impact of NKEFAs on carbon sequestration (CS) and environmental quality (EQ) based on the panel data of 330 cities in China from 2001 to 2019. Then, we explore whether the co-benefits of ecological product supply and eco-environment protection can be achieved. Results and discussionNKEFAs can enhance CS and EQ and thus achieve co-benefits for both. NKEFAs can achieve the co-benefits of CS and EQ through territory spatial allocation and labor force aggregation, but industrial structure upgrading only positively mediates the impact of NKEFAs on CS. The co-benefits of CS and EQ are heterogeneous across functional area types, geospatial locations, and quantiles, while only CS at windbreak-sand fixation area, northwestern region, and low quantile regions is enhanced. This study makes a theoretical and methodological contribution to the existing literature on the policy effect assessment of ecological engineering. It also provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the ecological effects of relevant policies in other countries by integrating the co-benefits of ecological products and eco-environment, analyzing regional heterogeneity, and exploring the underlying mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental co-benefits of urban greening for mitigating heat and carbon emissions
    Li, Peiyuan
    Wang, Zhi-Hua
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 293
  • [32] Environmental economic co-benefits and offsets effects of China's unified energy-carbon market
    Xu, Zhongwen
    Wu, Yiqiong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 331
  • [33] Co-benefits of policies to reduce air pollution and carbon emissions in China
    Xian, Botong
    Xu, Yalin
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Yanan
    Qiu, Lu
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2024, 104
  • [34] Co-benefits of policies to reduce air pollution and carbon emissions in China
    Xian, Botong
    Xu, Yalin
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Yanan
    Qiu, Lu
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 104
  • [35] Air quality and health co-benefits of China's carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030
    Tang, Rong
    Zhao, Jing
    Liu, Yifan
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yanxu
    Zhou, Derong
    Ding, Aijun
    Nielsen, Chris P.
    Wang, Haikun
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [36] Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030
    Rong Tang
    Jing Zhao
    Yifan Liu
    Xin Huang
    Yanxu Zhang
    Derong Zhou
    Aijun Ding
    Chris P. Nielsen
    Haikun Wang
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [37] Health and Environmental Co-Benefits of City Urban Form in Latin America: An Ecological Study
    Avila-Palencia, Ione
    Sanchez, Brisa N.
    Rodriguez, Daniel A.
    Perez-Ferrer, Carolina
    Jaime Miranda, J.
    Gouveia, Nelson
    Bilal, Usama
    Useche, Andres F.
    Wilches-Mogollon, Maria A.
    Moore, Kari
    Sarmiento, Olga L.
    Roux, Ana V. Diez
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [38] Consumer perceptions of the co-benefits of biosolids and carbon sequestration in a fertiliser aimed at the urban retail market
    Lu, Jacky
    Mickan, Bede S.
    Okely, Heath
    Rollins, Curtis
    Burton, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 433
  • [39] ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE CHANGE CO-BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF WIND POWER GENERATION IN CHINA
    Yang, Jin
    CUE 2015 - APPLIED ENERGY SYMPOSIUM AND SUMMIT 2015: LOW CARBON CITIES AND URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 88 : 76 - 81
  • [40] Charcoal addition to soils in NE England: A carbon sink with environmental co-benefits?
    Bell, M. J.
    Worrall, F.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 409 (09) : 1704 - 1714