Co-benefits of the National Key Ecological Function Areas in China for carbon sequestration and environmental quality

被引:6
|
作者
Chen, Hanyu [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Mengyang [1 ,2 ]
Xi, Zenglei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiao [3 ,4 ]
Yao, Shunbo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Sch Econ, Baoding, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ, Res Ctr Resources Utilizat & Environm Conservat, Baoding, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yangling, Peoples R China
[4] Northwest A&F Univ, Ctr Resource Econ & Environm Management, Yangling, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
National Key Ecological Function Areas; carbon sequestration; environmental quality; co-benefits; time-varying difference-in-differences; China; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1093135
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe National Key Ecological Functional Areas (NKEFAs) are location-oriented ecological engineering of China, which rely on the main functional area planning. The co-benefits of ecological product supply and ecological environment improvement of NKEFAs has not been fully assessed in the literature. MethodsNKEFAs is considered a quasi-natural experiment, and the time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) model is used to assess the impact of NKEFAs on carbon sequestration (CS) and environmental quality (EQ) based on the panel data of 330 cities in China from 2001 to 2019. Then, we explore whether the co-benefits of ecological product supply and eco-environment protection can be achieved. Results and discussionNKEFAs can enhance CS and EQ and thus achieve co-benefits for both. NKEFAs can achieve the co-benefits of CS and EQ through territory spatial allocation and labor force aggregation, but industrial structure upgrading only positively mediates the impact of NKEFAs on CS. The co-benefits of CS and EQ are heterogeneous across functional area types, geospatial locations, and quantiles, while only CS at windbreak-sand fixation area, northwestern region, and low quantile regions is enhanced. This study makes a theoretical and methodological contribution to the existing literature on the policy effect assessment of ecological engineering. It also provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the ecological effects of relevant policies in other countries by integrating the co-benefits of ecological products and eco-environment, analyzing regional heterogeneity, and exploring the underlying mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate change and air quality -: Measures with co-benefits in China
    Aunan, Kristin
    Fang, Jinghua
    Hu, Tao
    Seip, Hans Martin
    Vennemo, Haakon
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (16) : 4822 - 4829
  • [22] Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality
    Mathijs J. H. M. Harmsen
    Pim van Dorst
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Maarten van den Berg
    Rita Van Dingenen
    Zbigniew Klimont
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1519 - 1538
  • [23] Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality
    Harmsen, Mathijs J. H. M.
    van Dorst, Pim
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    van den Berg, Maarten
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1519 - 1538
  • [24] Co-benefits of carbon and pollution control policies on air quality and health till 2030 in China
    Yang, Jinzhao
    Zhao, Yu
    Cao, Jing
    Nielsen, Chris P.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 152
  • [25] Co-benefits of deep carbon reduction on air quality and health improvement in Sichuan Province of China
    Zhang, Silu
    Wu, Yazhen
    Liu, Xiaorui
    Qian, Jun
    Chen, Junhui
    Han, Li
    Dai, Hancheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (09)
  • [26] Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China (vol 8, pg 398, 2018)
    Li, Mingwei
    Zhang, Da
    Li, Chiao-Ting
    Mulvaney, Kathleen M.
    Selin, Noelle E.
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (08) : 750 - 750
  • [27] Transfers and environmental co-benefits of carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: retiring agricultural land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
    Feng, Hongli
    Kurkalova, Lyubov A.
    Kling, Catherine L.
    Gassman, Philip W.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2007, 80 (1-2) : 91 - 107
  • [28] Transfers and environmental co-benefits of carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: retiring agricultural land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
    Hongli Feng
    Lyubov A. Kurkalova
    Catherine L. Kling
    Philip W. Gassman
    Climatic Change, 2007, 80 : 91 - 107
  • [29] Co-benefits of peaking carbon dioxide emissions on air quality and health, a case of Guangzhou, China
    Wu, Pengcheng
    Guo, Fang
    Cai, Bofeng
    Wang, Can
    Lv, Chen
    Liu, Hui
    Huang, Jizhang
    Huang, Ying
    Cao, Libin
    Pang, Lingyun
    Gao, Ji
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 282
  • [30] Regional variations of environmental co-benefits of wind power generation in China
    Yang, Jin
    Song, Dan
    Wu, Feng
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 206 : 1267 - 1281