Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients Who Have Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty as Well as Their Fate

被引:8
|
作者
Chen, Yi-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Yu-Chih [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Chih-Hsiang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Lee, Sheng-Hsun [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yuhan [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Educ, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Bone & Joint Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 5,Fuxing St, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
knee periprosthetic joint infection; 2-stage exchange arthroplasty; recurrent infection; prognosis; risk factor; REVISION; ANTIBIOTICS; DEBRIDEMENT; RETENTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the major risk factors for infection recurrence and the prognosis after infection recurrence.Methods: This study included 203 patients who underwent 2-stage exchange arthroplasty between June 22, 2010 and January 24, 2017. The need of reoperation for infection-related or PJI-related mortality was considered treatment failure. Participant age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, culture results, length of hospital stay, cause of treatment failure, operative procedure, and fate were analyzed.Results: Fifty-three patients experienced treatment failure (26.1%). Mean follow-up was 63 months (range, 26-103). Based on the multivariate analyses, risk factors for treatment failure included men and positive intraoperative culture during reimplantation. Recurrent infection was most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (32.1%, 17/53), and new microorganisms caused recurrent infection in 34 of 53 (64.2%) patients. In 44 patients who had treatment failure, debridement, antibiotic therapy, irrigation, and retention of prosthesis (DAIR) performed within 6 months of reimplantation and at <3 weeks from symptom onset resulted in a significantly higher success rate than the use of other DAIR protocols (P 1/4 .031). Conclusion: Men and positive intraoperative culture are major risk factors for 2-stage exchange arthroplasty failure in patients who have knee PJI. Recurrent infection in these patients is usually caused by new microorganisms. DAIR within 6 months of reimplantation and at <3 weeks from symptom onset results in good outcomes in these patients.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty
    Janna van den Kieboom
    Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala
    Liang Xiong
    Christian Klemt
    Young-Min Kwon
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022, 142 : 3565 - 3574
  • [42] Analysis of the clinical efficacy of two-stage revision surgery in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection in the knee: A retrospective study
    Qiao, Yong-Jie
    Li, Feng
    Zhang, Lv-Dan
    Yu, Xin-Yuan
    Zhang, Hao-Qiang
    Yang, Wen-Bin
    Song, Xiao-Yang
    Xu, Rui-Ling
    Zhou, Sheng-Hu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (36) : 13239 - 13249
  • [43] Transfer of Patient Care During Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Leads to Inferior Outcomes
    Dietz, Matthew J.
    Choi, Ho-Rim
    Freiberg, Andrew A.
    Bedair, Hany
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07) : 1426 - 1429
  • [44] Failure After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Antibiotics in the Cement Spacer
    Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan
    Kheir, Michael M.
    Moya, Ignacio
    Rondon, Alexander J.
    Kheir, Matthew
    Lozano, Luis
    Parvizi, Javad
    Soriano, Alex
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 68 (12) : 2087 - 2093
  • [45] Outcomes of repeat two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection
    Khan, N.
    Parmar, D.
    Ibrahim, M. S.
    Kayani, B.
    Haddad, F. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (06) : 110 - 115
  • [46] Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Kong, Lingde
    Cao, Junming
    Zhang, Yingze
    Ding, Wenyuan
    Shen, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (03) : 529 - 536
  • [47] Laboratory Tests for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection Can Help Predict Outcomes of Two-Stage Exchange
    Dwyer, Maureen K.
    Damsgaard, Christopher
    Wadibia, Jason
    Wong, Gordon
    Lazar, Damien
    Smith, Eric
    Talmo, Carl
    Bedair, Hany
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (12) : 1009 - 1015
  • [48] Current actual success rate of the two-stage exchange arthroplasty strategy in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection INSIGHTS INTO NON-COMPLETED SECOND-STAGE CASES
    Corona, P. S.
    Vicente, M.
    Carrera, L.
    Rodriguez-Pardo, D.
    Corro, S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (12) : 1682 - 1688
  • [49] The direct anterior approach: treating periprosthetic joint infection of the hip using two-stage revision arthroplasty
    Thaler, Martin
    Lechner, Ricarda
    Dammerer, Dietmar
    Leitner, Hermann
    Khosravi, Ismail
    Nogler, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (02) : 255 - 262
  • [50] Articular spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip and the knee
    Craig, Andy
    King, S. W.
    van Duren, B. H.
    Veysi, V. T.
    Jain, S.
    Palan, J.
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2022, 7 (02) : 137 - 152