Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients Who Have Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty as Well as Their Fate

被引:8
|
作者
Chen, Yi-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Yu-Chih [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Chih-Hsiang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Lee, Sheng-Hsun [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yuhan [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Educ, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Bone & Joint Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 5,Fuxing St, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
knee periprosthetic joint infection; 2-stage exchange arthroplasty; recurrent infection; prognosis; risk factor; REVISION; ANTIBIOTICS; DEBRIDEMENT; RETENTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the major risk factors for infection recurrence and the prognosis after infection recurrence.Methods: This study included 203 patients who underwent 2-stage exchange arthroplasty between June 22, 2010 and January 24, 2017. The need of reoperation for infection-related or PJI-related mortality was considered treatment failure. Participant age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, culture results, length of hospital stay, cause of treatment failure, operative procedure, and fate were analyzed.Results: Fifty-three patients experienced treatment failure (26.1%). Mean follow-up was 63 months (range, 26-103). Based on the multivariate analyses, risk factors for treatment failure included men and positive intraoperative culture during reimplantation. Recurrent infection was most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (32.1%, 17/53), and new microorganisms caused recurrent infection in 34 of 53 (64.2%) patients. In 44 patients who had treatment failure, debridement, antibiotic therapy, irrigation, and retention of prosthesis (DAIR) performed within 6 months of reimplantation and at <3 weeks from symptom onset resulted in a significantly higher success rate than the use of other DAIR protocols (P 1/4 .031). Conclusion: Men and positive intraoperative culture are major risk factors for 2-stage exchange arthroplasty failure in patients who have knee PJI. Recurrent infection in these patients is usually caused by new microorganisms. DAIR within 6 months of reimplantation and at <3 weeks from symptom onset results in good outcomes in these patients.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan, Emerito
    Delgado-Martinez, Alberto D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (20)
  • [22] Application of structural allogenous bone graft in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for knee periprosthetic joint infection: a case control study
    Chuang, Chieh An
    Lee, Sheng-Hsun
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Hu, Chih-Chien
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Ueng, Steve W. N.
    Chang, Yuhan
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [23] Patient-Related Predictors of Treatment Failure After Two-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bhanushali, Ameya
    Tran, Liem
    Nairne-Nagy, Jaiden
    Bereza, Samuel
    Callary, Stuart A.
    Atkins, Gerald J.
    Ramasamy, Boopalan
    Solomon, Lucian B.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09) : 2395 - 2402.e14
  • [24] Defining Treatment Success After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Goswami, Karan
    Fillingham, Yale A.
    Shohat, Noam
    Rondon, Alexander J.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (11) : 3541 - 3546
  • [25] Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty
    Juan F. Blanco
    Agustín Díaz
    Francisco R. Melchor
    Carmen da Casa
    David Pescador
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 239 - 245
  • [26] The Change of Serum Interleukin-6 Fails to Identify Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Who Have Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Krueger, Johanna S.
    Ackmann, Thomas
    Gosheger, Georg
    Moellenbeck, Burkhard
    Puetzler, Jan
    Theil, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (12) : 2698 - 2703
  • [27] The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: safety and efficacy of two stage versus one stage exchange arthroplasty
    Palmer, Joseph R.
    Pannu, Tejbir S.
    Villa, Jesus M.
    Manrique, Jorge
    Riesgo, Aldo M.
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2020, 17 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [28] Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection
    Hubert, Jan
    Beil, Frank Timo
    Rolvien, Tim
    Ries, Christian
    Frosch, Stephan
    Saul, Dominik
    Hawellek, Thelonius
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [29] Periprosthetic Infection Recurrence After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: Failure or Fate?
    Triantafyllopoulos, Georgios K.
    Memtsoudis, Stavros G.
    Zhang, Wei
    Ma, Yan
    Sculco, Thomas P.
    Poultsides, Lazaros A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (02) : 526 - 531
  • [30] Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection Is Associated with High Rate of Failure to Reimplant and Mortality
    Akguen, Doruk
    Wietholter, Mats
    Maziak, Nina
    Paksoy, Alp
    Karczewski, Daniel
    Scheibel, Markus
    Moroder, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)