Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff

被引:12
作者
Hattori, Kenshin [1 ]
Inaba, Yohei [1 ,2 ]
Kato, Toshiki [1 ]
Fujisawa, Masaki [1 ]
Yasuno, Hikaru [1 ]
Yamada, Ayumi [1 ]
Haga, Yoshihiro [1 ,3 ]
Suzuki, Masatoshi [1 ,2 ]
Zuguchi, Masayuki [1 ]
Chida, Koichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Course Radiol Technol, Hlth Sci, 2-1 Seiryo,Aoba ku, Sendai 9808575, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Dept Radiat Disaster Med, 468-1 Aramaki Aza Aoba,Aoba ku, Sendai 9800845, Japan
[3] Sendai Kousei Hosp, Dept Radiol, 4-5 Hirose machi,Aoba ku, Sendai 9800873, Japan
关键词
radiation protection and safety; fluoroscopy; interventional radiology (IVR); fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); eye lens dose; occupational radiation exposure; X-ray examination; real-time radiation sensor; RADIATION PROTECTION; FOLLOW-UP; EYE; PHYSICIANS; PERFORMANCE; INJURIES; EXPOSURE; EYEWEAR;
D O I
10.3390/s23010512
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a significant reduction in the lens-equivalent radiation dose limit, thus from an average of 150 to 20 mSv/year over 5 years. In recent years, the occupational dose has been rising with the increased sophistication of interventional radiology (IVR); management of IVR staff radiation doses has become more important, making real-time radiation monitoring of such staff desirable. Recently, the i3 real-time occupational exposure monitoring system (based on RaySafe (TM)) has replaced the conventional i2 system. Here, we compared the i2 and i3 systems in terms of sensitivity (batch uniformity), tube-voltage dependency, dose linearity, dose-rate dependency, and angle dependency. The sensitivity difference (batch uniformity) was approximately 5%, and the tube-voltage dependency was <+/- 20% between 50 and 110 kV. Dose linearity was good (R-2 = 1.00); a slight dose-rate dependency (similar to 20%) was evident at very high dose rates (250 mGy/h). The i3 dosimeter showed better performance for the lower radiation detection limit compared with the i2 system. The horizontal and vertical angle dependencies of i3 were superior to those of i2. Thus, i3 sensitivity was higher over a wider angle range compared with i2, aiding the measurement of scattered radiation. Unlike the i2 sensor, the influence of backscattered radiation (i.e., radiation from an angle of 180 degrees) was negligible. Therefore, the i3 system may be more appropriate in areas affected by backscatter. In the future, i3 will facilitate real-time dosimetry and dose management during IVR and other applications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [51] The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
    Morishima, Yoshiaki
    Chida, Koichi
    Katahira, Yoshiaki
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [52] Novel Dosimeter Using a Nontoxic Phosphor for Real-Time Monitoring of Patient Radiation Dose in Interventional Radiology
    Nakamura, Masaaki
    Chida, Koichi
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (02) : W202 - W206
  • [53] Red emission phosphor for real-time skin dosimeter for fluoroscopy and interventional radiology
    Nakamura, Masaaki
    Chida, Koichi
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (10)
  • [54] Reducing the Breast Cancer Risk and Radiation Dose of Radiography for Scoliosis in Children: A Phantom Study
    Nemoto, Manami
    Chida, Koichi
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (10)
  • [55] Occupational radiation dose to eyes from interventional radiology procedures in light of the new eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection
    O'Connor, U.
    Walsh, C.
    Gallagher, A.
    Dowling, A.
    Guiney, M.
    Ryan, J. M.
    McEniff, N.
    O'Reilly, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1049)
  • [56] Assessment of the occupational eye lens dose for clinical staff in interventional radiology, cardiology and neuroradiology
    Omar, Artur
    Kadesjo, Nils
    Palmgren, Charlotta
    Marteinsdottir, Maria
    Segerdahl, Tony
    Fransson, Annette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2017, 37 (01) : 145 - 159
  • [57] Development of a New Radiation Shield for the Face and Neck of IVR Physicians
    Sato, Toshimitsu
    Eguchi, Yoichi
    Yamazaki, Chika
    Hino, Takanobu
    Saida, Toshikazu
    Chida, Koichi
    [J]. BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2022, 9 (08):
  • [58] Task Group on Accident Prevention and Safety in Radiation Therapy, 2000, Ann ICRP, V30, P7
  • [59] Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories
    Vaño, E
    González, L
    Beneytez, F
    Moreno, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (847) : 728 - 733
  • [60] Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: Caution is warranted
    Vano, Eliseo
    Gonzalez, Luciano
    Fernandez, Jose M.
    Haskal, Ziv J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) : 945 - 953