Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff

被引:12
|
作者
Hattori, Kenshin [1 ]
Inaba, Yohei [1 ,2 ]
Kato, Toshiki [1 ]
Fujisawa, Masaki [1 ]
Yasuno, Hikaru [1 ]
Yamada, Ayumi [1 ]
Haga, Yoshihiro [1 ,3 ]
Suzuki, Masatoshi [1 ,2 ]
Zuguchi, Masayuki [1 ]
Chida, Koichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Course Radiol Technol, Hlth Sci, 2-1 Seiryo,Aoba ku, Sendai 9808575, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Dept Radiat Disaster Med, 468-1 Aramaki Aza Aoba,Aoba ku, Sendai 9800845, Japan
[3] Sendai Kousei Hosp, Dept Radiol, 4-5 Hirose machi,Aoba ku, Sendai 9800873, Japan
关键词
radiation protection and safety; fluoroscopy; interventional radiology (IVR); fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); eye lens dose; occupational radiation exposure; X-ray examination; real-time radiation sensor; RADIATION PROTECTION; FOLLOW-UP; EYE; PHYSICIANS; PERFORMANCE; INJURIES; EXPOSURE; EYEWEAR;
D O I
10.3390/s23010512
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a significant reduction in the lens-equivalent radiation dose limit, thus from an average of 150 to 20 mSv/year over 5 years. In recent years, the occupational dose has been rising with the increased sophistication of interventional radiology (IVR); management of IVR staff radiation doses has become more important, making real-time radiation monitoring of such staff desirable. Recently, the i3 real-time occupational exposure monitoring system (based on RaySafe (TM)) has replaced the conventional i2 system. Here, we compared the i2 and i3 systems in terms of sensitivity (batch uniformity), tube-voltage dependency, dose linearity, dose-rate dependency, and angle dependency. The sensitivity difference (batch uniformity) was approximately 5%, and the tube-voltage dependency was <+/- 20% between 50 and 110 kV. Dose linearity was good (R-2 = 1.00); a slight dose-rate dependency (similar to 20%) was evident at very high dose rates (250 mGy/h). The i3 dosimeter showed better performance for the lower radiation detection limit compared with the i2 system. The horizontal and vertical angle dependencies of i3 were superior to those of i2. Thus, i3 sensitivity was higher over a wider angle range compared with i2, aiding the measurement of scattered radiation. Unlike the i2 sensor, the influence of backscattered radiation (i.e., radiation from an angle of 180 degrees) was negligible. Therefore, the i3 system may be more appropriate in areas affected by backscatter. In the future, i3 will facilitate real-time dosimetry and dose management during IVR and other applications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-time patient radiation dosimeter for use in interventional radiology
    Chida, Koichi
    Kato, Mamoru
    Inaba, Yohei
    Kobayashi, Ryota
    Nakamura, Masaaki
    Abe, Yoshihisa
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (11): : 1475 - 1478
  • [2] Real-time wireless personal dosimeter for Interventional Radiology Procedures
    Servoli, L.
    Solestizi, L. Alunni
    Biasini, M.
    Bissi, L.
    Calandra, A.
    Chiatti, L.
    Cicioni, R.
    Di Lorenzo, R.
    Dipilato, A. C.
    Fabiani, S.
    Kanxheri, K.
    Italiani, M.
    Magalotti, D.
    Paolucci, M.
    Placidi, P.
    Scorzonia, A.
    Trivisonne, S.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2019, 936 : 65 - 66
  • [3] An Active Pixel Sensor based System for Real Time Dosimeter in Interventional Radiology
    Conti, E.
    Placidi, P.
    Baldaccini, F.
    Biasini, M.
    Bissi, L.
    Calandra, A.
    Checcucci, B.
    Chiocchini, S.
    Cicioni, R.
    Di Lorenzo, R.
    Dipilato, A. C.
    Esposito, A.
    Fano, L.
    Paolucci, M.
    Passeri, D.
    Pentiricci, A.
    Servoli, L.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2012, : 1933 - 1937
  • [4] Effectiveness of a novel real-time dosimeter in interventional radiology: a comparison of new and old radiation sensors
    Inaba Y.
    Nakamura M.
    Chida K.
    Zuguchi M.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2018, 11 (4) : 445 - 450
  • [5] A real time active pixel dosimeter for interventional radiology
    Paolucci, M.
    Battisti, D.
    Biasini, M.
    Checcucci, B.
    Di Lorenzo, R.
    Esposito, A.
    Fano, L.
    Passeri, D.
    Placidi, P.
    Servoli, L.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2011, 46 (11) : 1271 - 1276
  • [6] Red emission phosphor for real-time skin dosimeter for fluoroscopy and interventional radiology
    Nakamura, Masaaki
    Chida, Koichi
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (10)
  • [7] Fundamental study of a real-time occupational dosimetry system for interventional radiology staff
    Inaba, Yohei
    Chida, Koichi
    Kobayashi, Ryota
    Kaga, Yuji
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2014, 34 (03) : N65 - N71
  • [8] Novel Dosimeter Using a Nontoxic Phosphor for Real-Time Monitoring of Patient Radiation Dose in Interventional Radiology
    Nakamura, Masaaki
    Chida, Koichi
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (02) : W202 - W206
  • [9] Performance of CMOS imager as sensing element for a Real-time Active Pixel Dosimeter for Interventional Radiology procedures
    Magalotti, D.
    Bissi, L.
    Conti, E.
    Paolucci, M.
    Placidi, P.
    Scorzoni, A.
    Servoli, L.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2014, 9
  • [10] Effect of Real-Time Radiation Dose Feedback on Pediatric Interventional Radiology Staff Radiation Exposure
    Racadio, John
    Nachabe, Rami
    Carelsen, Bart
    Racadio, Judy
    Hilvert, Nicole
    Johnson, Neil
    Kukreja, Kamlesh
    Patel, Manish
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) : 119 - 126