Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff

被引:12
作者
Hattori, Kenshin [1 ]
Inaba, Yohei [1 ,2 ]
Kato, Toshiki [1 ]
Fujisawa, Masaki [1 ]
Yasuno, Hikaru [1 ]
Yamada, Ayumi [1 ]
Haga, Yoshihiro [1 ,3 ]
Suzuki, Masatoshi [1 ,2 ]
Zuguchi, Masayuki [1 ]
Chida, Koichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Course Radiol Technol, Hlth Sci, 2-1 Seiryo,Aoba ku, Sendai 9808575, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Dept Radiat Disaster Med, 468-1 Aramaki Aza Aoba,Aoba ku, Sendai 9800845, Japan
[3] Sendai Kousei Hosp, Dept Radiol, 4-5 Hirose machi,Aoba ku, Sendai 9800873, Japan
关键词
radiation protection and safety; fluoroscopy; interventional radiology (IVR); fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); eye lens dose; occupational radiation exposure; X-ray examination; real-time radiation sensor; RADIATION PROTECTION; FOLLOW-UP; EYE; PHYSICIANS; PERFORMANCE; INJURIES; EXPOSURE; EYEWEAR;
D O I
10.3390/s23010512
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a significant reduction in the lens-equivalent radiation dose limit, thus from an average of 150 to 20 mSv/year over 5 years. In recent years, the occupational dose has been rising with the increased sophistication of interventional radiology (IVR); management of IVR staff radiation doses has become more important, making real-time radiation monitoring of such staff desirable. Recently, the i3 real-time occupational exposure monitoring system (based on RaySafe (TM)) has replaced the conventional i2 system. Here, we compared the i2 and i3 systems in terms of sensitivity (batch uniformity), tube-voltage dependency, dose linearity, dose-rate dependency, and angle dependency. The sensitivity difference (batch uniformity) was approximately 5%, and the tube-voltage dependency was <+/- 20% between 50 and 110 kV. Dose linearity was good (R-2 = 1.00); a slight dose-rate dependency (similar to 20%) was evident at very high dose rates (250 mGy/h). The i3 dosimeter showed better performance for the lower radiation detection limit compared with the i2 system. The horizontal and vertical angle dependencies of i3 were superior to those of i2. Thus, i3 sensitivity was higher over a wider angle range compared with i2, aiding the measurement of scattered radiation. Unlike the i2 sensor, the influence of backscattered radiation (i.e., radiation from an angle of 180 degrees) was negligible. Therefore, the i3 system may be more appropriate in areas affected by backscatter. In the future, i3 will facilitate real-time dosimetry and dose management during IVR and other applications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Radiation Cataractogenesis: A Review of Recent Studies
    Ainsbury, E. A.
    Bouffler, S. D.
    Doerr, W.
    Graw, J.
    Muirhead, C. R.
    Edwards, A. A.
    Cooper, J.
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 2009, 172 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ICRP Publication, DOI [DOI 10.1177/ANIB_42_1, 10.1177/ANIB_42_1]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE
  • [4] [Anonymous], RAYSAFEI3
  • [5] [Anonymous], RAYSAFE I3 REAL TIM
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, STAT TISS REACT
  • [7] OCCUPATIONAL EYE LENS DOSE ESTIMATED USING WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETER IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY: A MONTE CARLO STUDY
    Bozovic, Predrag
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
    Petrovic, Jelena Stankovic
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2019, 185 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [8] Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures
    Chida, K
    Saito, H
    Otani, H
    Kohzuki, M
    Takahashi, S
    Yamada, S
    Shirato, K
    Zuguchi, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (03) : 774 - 778
  • [9] Effect of Radiation Monitoring Method and Formula Differences on Estimated Physician Dose during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Chida, K.
    Morishima, Y.
    Masuyama, H.
    Chiba, H.
    Katahira, Y.
    Inaba, Y.
    Mori, I.
    Maruoka, S.
    Takahashi, S.
    Kohzuki, M.
    Zuguchi, M.
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [10] What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?
    Chida, Koichi
    [J]. RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 15 (02) : 101 - 115