An integrated QFD and fuzzy TOPSIS approach for supplier evaluation and selection

被引:9
作者
Sharma, Jitendra [1 ]
Tripathy, Bibhuti Bhusan [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Management Technol Nagpur, Dept Operat Management, Nagpur, India
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Supplier selection; QFD; Fuzzy theory; Fuzzy TOPSIS; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; DECISION-MAKING; CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; MCDM APPROACH; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-09-2022-0295
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeSupplier evaluation and selection is an essential (multi-criteria decision-making) MCDM process that considers qualitative and quantitative factors. This research work attempts to use a MCDM technique based on merging fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) ideas. The study attempts to find the supplier's attributes (HOWs) to accomplish its goals after determining the product's characteristics to suit the company's needs (WHATs).Design/methodology/approachThe proposed research methodology comprises the following four steps: Step 1: Determine the product purchase requirements ("WHATs") and those pertinent to supplier evaluation ("HOWs"). In Step 2, the relative importance of the "WHAT-HOW" correlation scores is determined and also the resulting weights of "HOWs". In Step 3, linguistic evaluations of possible suppliers in comparison to subjective criteria are given to the decision-makers. Step 4 combines the QFD and F-TOPSIS techniques to select suppliers.FindingsA fuzzy MCDM method based on fusing and integrating fuzzy information and QFD is presented to solve the drawbacks of conventional decision-making strategies used in supplier selection. Using the F-TOPSIS method, fuzzy positive ideal solution (FPIS) and fuzzy negative ideal solution (FNIS), the relative closeness coefficient values for all alternatives are computed. The suppliers are ranked by relating the closeness of coefficient values. This method permits the combination of ambiguous and subjective data expressed as fuzzy-defined integers or linguistic variables.Originality/valueQFD and TOPSIS, two widely used approaches, are combined in this article to rank and evaluate suppliers based on the traits that the suppliers choose to prioritize. This study demonstrates that the method employed could address multiple-criteria decision-making scenarios in a computationally efficient manner. The effectiveness and applicability of the method are illustrated using an example.
引用
收藏
页码:2387 / 2412
页数:26
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Supply chain integration and export performance: the mediating role of supply chain performance [J].
Abdallah, Ayman Bahjat ;
Rawadiah, Omar Mohammad ;
Al-Byati, Walaa ;
Alhyari, Salah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, :1907-1929
[2]   RETRACTED: Three-way decisions based on neutrosophic sets and AHP-QFD framework for supplier selection problem (Retracted article. See vol. 128, pg. 569, 2022) [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
Manogaran, Gunasekaran ;
Mohamed, Mai ;
Chilamkurti, Naveen .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 89 :19-30
[3]  
Akao Y., 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P20, DOI 10.1108/02656710310453791
[4]   A stochastic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making for sustainable vendor selection in Indian petroleum refining sector [J].
Akhtar, Mohammad ;
Ahmad, Md Tanweer .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (03) :963-996
[5]   An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management: A case study of ISP selection and evaluation [J].
Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh ;
Razmi, Jafar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8639-8648
[6]  
De Boer L., 2001, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V7, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012, 10.1016/S0969-7012, 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9, DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9]
[7]   A fuzzy solution approach for multi objective supplier selection [J].
Arikan, Feyzan .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (03) :947-952
[8]   AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD - AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION [J].
ARMACOST, RL ;
COMPONATION, PJ ;
MULLENS, MA ;
SWART, WW .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (04) :72-79
[9]  
Asadabadi M.R., 2014, INT J IND ENG COMP, V5, P543, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.IJIEC.2014.7.005
[10]  
Badi I, 2018, Dec Mak: Appl Manag Eng, V1, P15, DOI [10.31181/dmame1802016b, DOI 10.31181/DMAME1802016B]