Supply chain risk factor assessment of Indian pharmaceutical industry for performance improvement

被引:10
作者
Sharma, Astha [1 ]
Kumar, Dinesh [1 ]
Arora, Navneet [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Risk analysis; Fuzzy synthetic evaluation; Pharmaceutical industry; Healthcare; DRUG SHORTAGES; MAGICAL NUMBER; MANAGEMENT; COVID-19; PROJECTS; RANKING; IMPACT; UNCERTAINTY; INDICATORS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-01-2022-0035
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of the present work is to improve the industry performance by identifying and quantifying the risks faced by the Indian pharmaceutical industry (IPI). The risk values for the prominent risks and overall industry are determined based on the four risk parameters, which would help determine the most contributive risks for mitigation. Design/methodology/approach An extensive literature survey was done to identify the risks, which were also validated by industry experts. The finalized risks were then evaluated using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) method, which is the most suitable approach for the risk assessment with parameters having a set of different risk levels. Findings The three most contributive sub-risks are counterfeit drugs, demand fluctuations and loss of customers due to partners' poor service performance, while the main risks obtained are demand, financial and logistics. Also, the overall risk value indicates that the industry faces medium to high risk. Practical implications The study identifies the critical risks which need to be mitigated for an efficient industry. The industry is most vulnerable to the demand risk category. Therefore, the managers should minimize this risk by mitigating its sub-risks, like demand fluctuations, bullwhip effect, etc. Another critical sub-risk, the counterfeit risk, should be managed by adopting advanced technologies like blockchain, artificial intelligence, etc. Originality/value There is insufficient literature focusing on risk quantification. Therefore, this work addresses this gap and obtains the industry's most critical risks. It also discusses suitable mitigation strategies for better industry performance.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 157
页数:39
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   To build or not to build, that is the uncertainty: Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of risks for sustainable housing in developing economies [J].
Adabre, Michael Atafo ;
Chan, Albert P. C. ;
Edwards, David J. ;
Osei-Kyei, Robert .
CITIES, 2022, 125
[2]   A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of the challenges of smart city development in developing countries [J].
Aghimien, Douglas Omoregie ;
Aigbavboa, Clinton ;
Edwards, David J. ;
Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed ;
Olomolaiye, Paul ;
Nash, Hazel ;
Onyia, Michael .
SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 11 (03) :405-421
[3]   Drug Governance: IoT-based Blockchain Implementation in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain [J].
Ahmadi, Victoria ;
Benjelloun, Sophia ;
El Kik, Michel ;
Sharma, Tanvi ;
Chi, Huihui ;
Zhou, Wei .
2020 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AND SECURE SERVICES (MOBISECSERV)), 2020,
[4]   A conceptual framework for operational performance measurement in wholesale organisations [J].
Al Majali, Faris Odeh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 72 (06) :1627-1645
[5]  
Al-Worafi Y.M., 2020, Drug Safety in Developing Countries: Achievements and Challenges, P21, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-819837-7.00003-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819837-7.00003-0]
[6]  
Alghamdie MI., 2021, Mater. Today Proc, DOI [10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.04.078, DOI 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.04.078]
[7]   Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in public-private partnership water supply projects in developing countries using fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach [J].
Ameyaw, Effah Ernest ;
Chan, Albert P. C. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (12) :5102-5116
[8]   Is a reputation for misconduct harmful? Evidence from corporate venture capital [J].
Anokhin, Sergey ;
Morgan, Todd ;
Schulze, William ;
Wuebker, Robert .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 138 :65-76
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Substandard and falsified medical products
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, SRP, V11, DOI [10.31838/srp.2020.4.16, DOI 10.31838/SRP.2020.4.16]