Tourism development affects on farmers household's livelihood: Case study in Vietnam

被引:7
作者
Song Van Nguyen [1 ]
Que Nguyen Dang [2 ]
Uan Tran Ba [3 ]
Nam Le Phuong [1 ]
Nam Nguyen Quang [4 ]
Phuong Nguyen Thi Minh [5 ]
Mai Tran Thi Hoang [5 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Natl Univ Agr VNUA, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Natl Acad Publ Adm NAPA, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Dien Bien Tech & Econ Coll DTEC, Dien Bien, Vietnam
[4] Ninh Binh Agr & Rural Dev Dept, Ninh Binh, Vietnam
[5] Vinh Univ VU, Nghe An, Vietnam
关键词
Tourism development; Livelihood effect index; Farmers household's livelihood; RURAL TOURISM; CONSERVATION; IMPACTS; INDUSTRY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-022-02614-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tourism development effects on the livelihood and income of farmers. This study applies the Livelihood Effect Index (LEI) to assess the degree of effect on the farmer's livelihood under tourism at 3 study sites, namely Dien Bien Phu city, Dien Bien district and Muong Nhe district, Vietnam. The LEI index consists of 5 main factors, including Natural capital (N), Human capital (H), Physical capital (P), Social capital (S), Financial capital (F). Results show that the Livelihood Effect Index in Dien Bien Phu city, Dien Bien district, and Muong Nhe district is 0.42, 0.43, and 0.37, respectively. This reflects the moderate level of effect on livelihood by tourism. However, tourism still has a positive impact on the income of farmers, as reflected by 39.39% of total households with increased income through tourism, and 65.43% of households considering tourism as a stable income source. In order to tourism generate main income source for farmers, some solutions are recommended, such as increasing investment capital by local government, upgrading transportation infrastructure, supporting knowledge and skills in tourism business, and subsidizing interest rate for farmers to encourage them to invest in tourism business.
引用
收藏
页码:15163 / 15181
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Aggarwal A., 2014, ATNA J TOURISM STUDI, V9, P29, DOI DOI 10.12727/AJTS.11.3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HUMAN DEV REPORT 200
[3]   Tourism and its impact on livelihood in Manaslu conservation area, Nepal [J].
K. C A. ;
Thapa Parajuli R.B. .
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2014, 16 (5) :1053-1063
[4]  
Ashley C., 2000, ODI Working Paper
[5]  
Atik M, 2010, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V19, P21
[6]   Savings, growth and the resource curse hypothesis [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Hamilton, K .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 31 (11) :1793-1807
[7]  
Balodi KN., 2014, J STUDIES DYNAMICS C, V1, P320
[8]   Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand [J].
Bennett, Nathan James ;
Dearden, Philip .
MARINE POLICY, 2014, 44 :107-116
[9]   Analysis of livelihood security: A case study in the Kali-Khola watershed of Nepal [J].
Bhandari, B. S. ;
Grant, M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (01) :17-26
[10]   Tourism and poverty relief [J].
Blake, Adam ;
Arbache, Jorge Saba ;
Sinclair, M. Thea ;
Teles, Vladimir .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (01) :107-126