Is qualitative social research in global health fulfilling its potential?: a systematic evidence mapping of research on point-of-care testing in low- and middle-income contexts

被引:1
作者
Perkins, Janet [1 ]
Nelson, Sarah [2 ]
Birley, Emma [2 ]
Mcswiggan, Emilie [2 ]
Dozier, Marshall [3 ]
McCarthy, Anna [4 ]
Atkins, Nadege [2 ]
Agyei-Manu, Eldad [2 ]
Rostron, Jasmin [2 ]
Kameda, Koichi [5 ]
Kelly, Ann [6 ]
Chandler, Clare [7 ]
Street, Alice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Dept Social Anthropol, Chrystal Macmillan Bldg,15a George Sq, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Old Med Sch, Usher Inst, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland
[3] Lib & Univ Collect & Informat Serv, Univ Edinburgh, Lib Acad Support Team, Argyle House,3 Lady Lawson St, Edinburgh EH3 9DR, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Social Work, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Chrystal Macmillan Bldg,15A George Sq, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, Scotland
[5] Ctr Populat & Dev CEPED, 45 Rue St Peres, F-75006 Paris, France
[6] Kings Coll London, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, Bush House North East Wing,30 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, England
[7] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Global Hlth & Dev, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Point-of-care testing; Diagnosis; Qualitative research; Social sciences; Developing countries; Global health; Low- and middle-income countries; Systematic evidence mapping; Decolonisation; SEARCH STRATEGIES; AUTHORSHIP TRENDS; PHILANTHROCAPITALISM;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10645-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundQualitative social research has made valuable contributions to understanding technology-based interventions in global health. However, we have little evidence of who is carrying out this research, where, how, for what purpose, or the overall scope of this body of work. To address these questions, we undertook a systematic evidence mapping of one area of technology-focused research in global health, related to the development, deployment and use of point-of-care tests (POCTs) for low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).MethodsWe conducted an exhaustive search to identify papers reporting on primary qualitative studies that explore the development, deployment, and use of POCTs in LMICs and screened results to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from included studies and descriptive analyses were conducted.ResultsOne hundred thirty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria, with numbers increasing year by year. Funding of studies was primarily credited to high income country (HIC)-based institutions (95%) and 64% of first authors were affiliated with HIC-based institutions. Study sites, in contrast, were concentrated in a small number of LMICs. Relatively few studies examined social phenomena related to POCTs that take place in HICs. Seventy-one percent of papers reported on studies conducted within the context of a trial or intervention. Eighty percent reported on studies considering POCTs for HIV and/or malaria. Studies overwhelmingly reported on POCT use (91%) within primary-level health facilities (60%) or in hospitals (30%) and explored the perspectives of the health workforce (70%).ConclusionsA reflexive approach to the role, status, and contribution of qualitative and social science research is crucial to identifying the contributions it can make to the production of global health knowledge and understanding the roles technology can play in achieving global health goals. The body of qualitative social research on POCTs for LMICs is highly concentrated in scope, overwhelmingly focuses on testing in the context of a narrow number of donor-supported initiatives and is driven by HIC resources and expertise. To optimise the full potential of qualitative social research requires the promotion of open and just research ecosystems that broaden the scope of inquiry beyond established public health paradigms and build social science capacity in LMICs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]   PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement [J].
McGowan, Jessie ;
Sampson, Margaret ;
Salzwedel, Douglas M. ;
Cogo, Elise ;
Foerster, Vicki ;
Lefebvre, Carol .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 75 :40-46
[42]  
Mitra Prasenjit, 2021, EJIFCC, V32, P195
[43]   Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships [J].
Morton, B. ;
Vercueil, A. ;
Masekela, R. ;
Heinz, E. ;
Reimer, L. ;
Saleh, S. ;
Kalinga, C. ;
Seekles, M. ;
Biccard, B. ;
Chakaya, J. ;
Abimbola, S. ;
Obasi, A. ;
Oriyo, N. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 (03) :264-276
[44]   The WHO list of essential in vitro diagnostics: Development and next steps [J].
Moussy, Francis Gabriel ;
Berumen, Adriana Velazquez ;
Pai, Madhukar .
EBIOMEDICINE, 2018, 37 :1-2
[45]   Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis [J].
Odendaal, Willem A. ;
Watkins, Jocelyn Anstey ;
Leon, Natalie ;
Goudge, Jane ;
Griffiths, Frances ;
Tomlinson, Mark ;
Daniels, Karen .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (03)
[46]   PREVALENCE OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT AMONG A GROUP OF RESEARCHERS IN NIGERIA [J].
Okonta, Patrick ;
Rossouw, Theresa .
DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2013, 13 (03) :149-157
[47]   Decolonising global health: where are the Southern voices? [J].
Oti, Samuel Oji ;
Ncayiyana, Jabulani .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (07)
[48]  
Packard R.M., 2016, HIST GLOBAL HLTH INT, DOI DOI 10.56021/9781421420325
[49]  
Pai M, 2019, Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Med J, V1, P3, DOI [10.2991/dsahmj.k.190225.001, DOI 10.2991/DSAHMJ.K.190225.001]
[50]   Essential medicines and essential diagnostics: a package deal [J].
Pai, Madhukar ;
Walia, Kamini ;
Boehme, Catharina C. .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 4 (10) :E492-E492