Purpose: Brachytherapy with episcleral plaques is the most common primary tumor treatment for uveal melanoma. This study aimed to compare the risk of tumor recurrence and metastatic death between 2 frequently used ruthenium 106 plaque designs: CCB (20.2 mm) and CCA (15.3 mm). Methods and Materials: Data were obtained from 1387 consecutive patients treated at St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 1981 and 2022 (439 with CCA and 948 with CCB plaques). During the period, scleral transillumination was performed to delineate tumor margins before plaque insertion, but accurate plaque positioning was not verified after scleral attachment, and no minimum scleral dose was used. Results: Patients treated with CCA plaques had smaller tumors than those treated with CCB plaques (mean diameter, 8.6 vs 10.5 mm; P < .001). There were no differences in patient sex, age, tumor distance to the optic disc, tumor apex dose, dose rate, or in rates of ciliary body involvement, eccentric plaque placement, or adjunct transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT). The average difference between plaque and tumor diameter was greater with the CCB plaque, and a smaller difference was an independent predictor of tumor recurrence. The 15-year incidence of tumor recurrence was 28% and 15% after treatment with CCA and CCB plaques, respectively (competing risk analysis, P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a lower risk for tumor recurrence with CCB plaques (hazard ratio, 0.50). Similarly, patients treated with CCB plaques had a lower risk for uveal melanoma-related mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77). The risk for either outcome was not lower for patients treated with adjunct TTT. Uni- and multivariate time-dependent Cox regressions demonstrated that tumor recurrence was associated with uveal melanoma-related and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Compared with 20-mm plaques, brachytherapy with 15-mm ruthenium plaques is associated with a higher risk for tumor recurrence and death. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by increasing safety margins and implementing effective methods to verify accurate plaque positioning. (C) 2023 The Author(s). Published by ElsevierInc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)