A Literature Review on Detecting, Verifying, and Mitigating Online Misinformation

被引:7
作者
Bodaghi, Arezo [1 ]
Schmitt, Ketra A. [1 ,2 ]
Watine, Pierre [1 ]
Fung, Benjamin C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Concordia Inst Informat Syst Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Ctr Engn Soc, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Sch Informat Studies, Montreal, PQ H3A 0G4, Canada
关键词
Conspiracy theory; misinformation detection; misinformation mitigation; misinformation verification; misinformation; rumor; satire; FAKE NEWS; RUMOR DETECTION; SOCIAL MEDIA; PROPAGATION; DISINFORMATION; NETWORK; DATASET; HEALTH; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1109/TCSS.2023.3289031
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Social media use has transformed communication and made social interaction more accessible. Public microblogs allow people to share and access news through existing and social-media-created social connections and access to public news sources. These benefits also create opportunities for the spread of false information. False information online can mislead people, decrease the benefits derived from social media, and reduce trust in genuine news. We divide false information into two categories: unintentional false information, also known as misinformation; and intentionally false information, also known as disinformation and fake news. Given the increasing prevalence of misinformation, it is imperative to address its dissemination on social media platforms. This survey focuses on six key aspects related to misinformation: 1) clarify the definition of misinformation to differentiate it from intentional forms of false information; 2) categorize proposed approaches to manage misinformation into three types: detection, verification, and mitigation; 3) review the platforms and languages for which these techniques have been proposed and tested; 4) describe the specific features that are considered in each category; 5) compare public datasets created to address misinformation and categorize into prelabeled content-only datasets and those including users and their connections; and 6) survey fact-checking websites that can be used to verify the accuracy of information. This survey offers a comprehensive and unprecedented review of misinformation, integrating various methodological approaches, datasets, and content-, user-, and network-based approaches, which will undoubtedly benefit future research in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:5119 / 5145
页数:27
相关论文
共 173 条
[1]  
Adamic, 2005, P 3 INT WORKSH LINK, DOI DOI 10.1145/1134271.1134277
[2]   Detecting High-Engaging Breaking News Rumors in Social Media [J].
Alkhodair, Sarah A. ;
Fung, Benjamin C. M. ;
Ding, Steven H. H. ;
Cheung, William K. ;
Huang, Shih-Chia .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 12 (01)
[3]   Detecting breaking news rumors of emerging topics in social media [J].
Alkhodair, Sarah A. ;
Ding, Steven H. H. ;
Fung, Benjamin C. M. ;
Liu, Junqiang .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 57 (02)
[4]   Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew ;
Yu, Chuan .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2019, 6 (02)
[5]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[6]   Online Misinformation Spread: A Systematic Literature Map [J].
Almaliki, Malik .
PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEM AND DATA MINING (ICISDM 2019), 2019, :171-178
[7]   Sentiment Analysis for Fake News Detection [J].
Alonso, Miguel A. ;
Vilares, David ;
Gomez-Rodriguez, Carlos ;
Vilares, Jesus .
ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (11)
[8]  
Alqurashi S., 2021, arXiv
[9]  
Aly R., 2021, ARXIV
[10]  
Amoruso M, 2020, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V69, P847