Decreasing Survey Response Rates in the Time of COVID-19: Implications for Analyses of Population Health and Health Inequities

被引:57
作者
Krieger, Nancy [1 ,3 ]
LeBlanc, Merrily [2 ]
Waterman, Pamela D. [1 ]
Reisner, Sari L. [1 ]
Testa, Christian [1 ]
Chen, Jarvis T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[2] Fenway Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Kresge 717, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
JUSTICE;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2023.307267
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. To examine whether, and if so how, US national and state survey response rates changed after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods. We compared the change in response rates between 2020 and 2019 of 6 (3 social and economic, 3 health focused) major US national surveys (2 with state response rates).Results. All the ongoing surveys except 1 reported relative decreases (-29%) in response rates. For example, the household response rate to the US Census American Community Survey decreased from 86.0% in 2019 to 71.2% in 2020, and the response rate of the US National Health Interview Survey decreased from 60.0% to 42.7% from the first to the second quarter of 2020. For all surveys, the greatest decreases in response rates occurred among persons with lower income and lower education.Conclusions. Socially patterned decreases in response rates pose serious challenges and must be addressed explicitly in all studies relying on data obtained since the onset of the pandemic.Public Health Implications. Artifactual reduction of estimates of the magnitude of health inequities attributable to differential response rates could adversely affect efforts to reduce these inequities. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(6):667-670. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307267)
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 670
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study [J].
Hathaway, Cassandra A. ;
Chavez, Melody N. ;
Kadono, Mika ;
Ketcher, Dana ;
Rollison, Dana E. ;
Siegel, Erin M. ;
Peoples, Anita R. ;
Ulrich, Cornelia M. ;
Penedo, Frank J. ;
Tworoger, Shelley S. ;
Gonzalez, Brian D. .
JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (03)
[2]   A Partisan Pandemic: How COVID-19 Was Primed for Polarization [J].
Hegland, Austin ;
Zhang, Annie Li ;
Zichettella, Brianna ;
Pasek, Josh .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 700 (01) :55-72
[3]   Prospective sampling bias in COVID-19 recruitment methods: experimental evidence from a national randomized survey testing recruitment materials [J].
Kennedy, Eric B. ;
Charifson, Mia ;
Jehn, Megan ;
Jensen, Eric A. ;
Vikse, Jenna .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[4]   Addressing Missing Data in Substance Use Research: A Review and Data Justice-based Approach [J].
King, Caroline ;
Englander, Honora ;
Priest, Kelsey C. ;
Korthuis, P. Todd ;
McPherson, Sterling .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (06) :454-456
[5]  
Krieger N., ADV NOVEL METHODS ME
[6]   Counting for Accountability in a Time of Catastrophe: COVID-19 and Other Deaths, Cohorts, Color Lines, and Dollar Signs [J].
Krieger, Nancy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 111 :S91-S92
[7]   ENOUGH: COVID-19, Structural Racism, Police Brutality, Plutocracy, Climate Change-and Time For Health Justice, Democratic Governance, an an Equitable, Sustainable Future [J].
Krieger, Nancy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (11) :1620-1623
[8]  
National Institutes of Health, 2022, END STRUCT RAC UNITE
[9]   Selection Mechanisms and Their Consequences: Understanding and Addressing Selection Bias [J].
Smith, Louisa H. .
CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 7 (04) :179-189
[10]   "I'm Not Sure What to Believe": Media Distrust and Opinion Formation during the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Ternullo, Stephanie .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 116 (03) :1096-1109