Who to escalate during a pandemic? A retrospective observational study about decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

被引:0
作者
Beresford, Stephanie [1 ]
Tandon, Aditi [1 ,2 ]
Farina, Sofia [1 ]
Johnston, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Crews, Maryam [1 ]
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Crit Care, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
COVID-19; critical care; frailty; clinical management;
D O I
10.1136/emermed-2022-212505
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundOptimal decision-making regarding who to admit to critical care in pandemic situations remains unclear. We compared age, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality in two separate COVID-19 surges based on the escalation decision made by the treating physician. MethodsA retrospective analysis of all referrals to critical care during the first COVID-19 surge (cohort 1, March/April 2020) and a late surge (cohort 2, October/November 2021) was undertaken. Patients with confirmed or high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection were included. A senior critical care physician assessed all patients regarding their suitability for potential intensive care unit admission. Demographics, CFS, 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality were compared depending on the escalation decision made by the attending physician. Results203 patients were included in the study, 139 in cohort 1 and 64 in cohort 2. There were no significant differences in age, CFS and 4C scores between the two cohorts. Patients deemed suitable for escalation by clinicians were significantly younger with significantly lower CFS and 4C scores compared with patients who were not deemed to benefit from escalation. This pattern was observed in both cohorts. Mortality in patients not deemed suitable for escalation was 61.8% in cohort 1 and 47.4% in cohort 2 (p < 0.001). ConclusionsDecisions who to escalate to critical care in settings with limited resources pose moral distress on clinicians. 4C score, age and CFS did not change significantly between the two surges but differed significantly between patients deemed suitable for escalation and those deemed unsuitable by clinicians. Risk prediction tools may be useful in a pandemic to supplement clinical decision-making, even though escalation thresholds require adjustments to reflect changes in risk profile and outcomes between different pandemic surges.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Intensive care units, the Achilles heel of France in the COVID-19 battle
    Annane, Djillali
    Federici, Laura
    Chagnon, Jean-Luc
    Diehl, Jean Luc
    Dreyfuss, Didier
    Guiot, Philippe
    Javouhey, Etienne
    Joram, Nicolas
    Lesieur, Olivier
    Rigaud, Jean Philippe
    Outin, Herve
    Sement, Arnaud
    Sevens, Chantal
    Thevenin, Didier
    Touati, Samia
    Terzi, Nicolas
    [J]. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2021, 2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19
  • [3] Ethical Guidance for Hard Decisions: A Critical Review of Early International COVID-19 ICU Triage Guidelines
    Aquino, Yves Saint James
    Rogers, Wendy A.
    Scully, Jackie Leach
    Magrabi, Farah
    Carter, Stacy M.
    [J]. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2022, 30 (02) : 163 - 195
  • [4] COVID-19 therapy and vaccination: a clinical narrative review
    Chinta, Siddharth
    Rodriguez-Guerra, Miguel
    Shaban, Mohammed
    Pandey, Neelanjana
    Jaquez-Duran, Maria
    Vittorio, Timothy J.
    [J]. DRUGS IN CONTEXT, 2023, 12
  • [5] Factors Related to Self-Reported Distress Experienced by Physicians During Their First COVID-19 Triage Decisions
    Chou, Francisca L.
    Abramson, David
    DiMaggio, Charles
    Hoven, Christina W.
    Susser, Ezra
    Andrews, Howard F.
    Chihuri, Stanford
    Lang, Barbara H.
    Ryan, Megan
    Herman, Daniel
    Susser, Ida
    Mascayano, Franco
    Li, Guohua
    [J]. DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2023, 16 (06) : 2520 - 2527
  • [6] Supporting Decision Making in Intensive Care: Ethical Principles for Managing Access to Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    D'Errico, Stefano
    Padovano, Martina
    Scopetti, Matteo
    Manetti, Federico
    Zanon, Martina
    Santurro, Alessandro
    Frati, Paola
    Fineschi, Vittorio
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [7] Frailty in Critical Care Medicine: A Review
    De Biasio, Justin C.
    Mittel, Aaron M.
    Mueller, Ariel L.
    Ferrante, Lauren E.
    Kim, Dae H.
    Shaefi, Shahzad
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (06) : 1462 - 1473
  • [8] Features of 20133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study
    Docherty, Annemarie B.
    Harrison, Ewen M.
    Green, Christopher A.
    Hardwick, Hayley E.
    Pius, Riinu
    Norman, Lisa
    Holden, Karl A.
    Read, Jonathan M.
    Dondelinger, Frank
    Carson, Gail
    Merson, Laura
    Lee, James
    Plotkin, Daniel
    Sigfrid, Louise
    Halpin, Sophie
    Jackson, Clare
    Gamble, Carrol
    Horby, Peter W.
    Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
    Ho, Antonia
    Russell, Clark D.
    Dunning, Jake
    Openshaw, Peter Jm
    Baillie, J. Kenneth
    Semple, Malcolm G.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 369
  • [9] Alpha to Omicron: Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Major SARS-CoV-2 Variants
    Esper, Frank P.
    Adhikari, Thamali M.
    Tu, Zheng Jin
    Cheng, Yu Wei
    El-Haddad, Kim
    Farkas, Daniel H.
    Bosler, David
    Rhoads, Daniel
    Procop, Gary W.
    Ko, Jennifer S.
    Jehi, Lara
    Li, Jing
    Rubin, Brian P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 227 (03) : 344 - 352
  • [10] Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision
    Fritz, Zoe
    Slowther, Anne-Marie
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356