Implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in medication reviews in a hospital setting

被引:3
|
作者
Hjemas, Bodil Jahren [1 ]
Bovre, Katrine [1 ]
Bjerknes, Kathrin [2 ]
Mathiesen, Liv [2 ]
Mellingsaeter, Marte Christine Rognstad [3 ]
Molden, Espen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] South Eastern Norway, Hosp Pharm Enterprise, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Pharm, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Nordbyhagen, Norway
[4] Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Ctr Psychopharmacol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
clinical pharmacy; drug-related problems; gene-drug interaction; hospital; implementation; medication review; pharmacogenetic testing; ADVERSE CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DRUG-RELATED PROBLEMS; CONCISE GUIDE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS; GENOTYPE; CLOPIDOGREL; RISK; POLYPHARMACY; METAANALYSIS; CYP2C19;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.15815
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimTo investigate whether it is feasible to perform pharmacogenetic testing and implement the test results as part of medication reviews during hospitalization of multimorbid patients. MethodsPatients with & GE;2 chronic conditions and & GE;5 regular drugs with at least one potential gene-drug interaction (GDI) were included from one geriatric and one cardiology ward for pharmacogenetic testing. After inclusion by the study pharmacist, blood samples were collected and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. For patients still hospitalized at the time when the pharmacogenetic test results were available, the information was used in medication reviews. Recommendations from the pharmacist on actionable GDIs were communicated to the hospital physicians, who subsequently decided on potential immediate changes or forwarded suggestions in referrals to general practitioners. ResultsThe pharmacogenetic test results were available for medication review in 18 of the 46 patients (39.1%), where median length of hospital stay was 4.7 days (1.6-18.3). The pharmacist recommended medication changes for 21 of 49 detected GDIs (42.9%). The hospital physicians accepted 19 (90.5%) of the recommendations. The most commonly detected GDIs involved metoprolol (CYP2D6 genotype), clopidogrel (CYP2C19 genotype) and atorvastatin (CYP3A4/5 and SLCOB1B1 genotype). ConclusionsThe study shows that implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for medication review of hospitalized patients has the potential to improve drug treatment before being transferred to primary care. However, the logistics workflow needs to be further optimized, as test results were available during hospitalization for less than half of the patients included in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:3116 / 3125
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implications of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Patients Taking Warfarin or Clopidogrel
    Donohue, Megan M.
    Tirschwell, David L.
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2011, 11 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [42] A cost–benefit analysis of hospital-wide medication reviews: a period prevalence study
    Sarah Wilkes
    Rianne J. Zaal
    Alan Abdulla
    Nicole G. M. Hunfeld
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 138 - 145
  • [43] Deep learning application to automated classification of recommendations made by hospital pharmacists during medication prescription review
    Alkanj, Ahmad
    Godet, Julien
    Johns, Erin
    Gourieux, Benedicte
    Michel, Bruno
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2024, 81 (11) : e296 - e303
  • [44] Impact of pharmacist's directed medication reconciliation on reducing medication discrepancies during transition of care in hospital setting
    Salameh, Lana K.
    Abu Farha, Rana K.
    Abu Hammour, Khawla M.
    Basheti, Iman A.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 10 (01) : 149 - 156
  • [45] Medication review and polypharmacy management in the hospital setting. The cases of Greece and Catalonia
    Gennimata, Dimitra
    Kampolis, Christos F.
    Vontetsianos, Theodore
    Mcintosh, Jennifer
    Codina, Carles
    Alonso, Albert
    Mair, Alpana
    Consortium, Simpathy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2017, 17
  • [46] Implementation fidelity of a clinical medication review intervention: process evaluation
    Willeboordse, F.
    Schellevis, F. G.
    Meulendijk, M. C.
    Hugtenburg, J. G.
    Elders, P. J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2018, 40 (03) : 550 - 565
  • [47] Physicians' attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing before and after pharmacogenetic education
    Luzum, Jasmine A.
    Luzum, Matthew J.
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (02) : 119 - 127
  • [48] Patient and hospital staff perspectives on introducing pharmacist-led medication reviews at an orthopedic ward: a mixed methods pilot study
    Revell, Joo Hanne Poulsen
    Schlunsen, Maja
    Kandasamy, Abisha
    Meijers, Annette
    Eggers, Jens
    Kjeldsen, Lene Juel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2025, : 794 - 802
  • [49] Integrating design thinking and implementation science principles in delivering a medication review service in the community pharmacy setting-An implementation testing study
    Mustafa, Maali
    Hatah, Ernieda
    Makmor-Bakry, Mohd
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [50] Perspectives of pharmacists on medication reviews- Exploring implementation research in service establishment in community settings
    Mustafa, Maali
    Hatah, Ernieda
    Makmor-Bakry, Mohd
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2023, 19 (04) : 673 - 680